Service Activity Roadmap for IT Oversight

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Organizations face challenges in ensuring that their computing systems and devices are running with correct software versions, are correctly configured, and have adequate capacity, particularly when relying on external service providers for maintenance, as existing oversight methods lack effectiveness in providing a comprehensive and detailed view of service performance.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for providing visual feedback through a service activity roadmap, which includes obtaining information about service provider activities, generating a graphical display of upcoming or past changes, and updating the display with additional information upon user selection, allowing for better monitoring and compliance with service agreements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If organizations rely on external service providers for computing system maintenance, then service coverage and expertise are improved, but visibility into service performance and ability to verify compliance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidvisibility into service performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where service provider activities are automatically collected, processed, and displayed on a roadmap. The roadmap provides visual feedback to customers about service status, enabling them to verify compliance with service level agreements and understand the current state of computing system maintenance without direct access to provider operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The service activity roadmap acts as an intermediary between service providers and customers. It translates detailed service provider activities into a visual, easily interpretable format that customers can understand, bridging the information gap without requiring customers to directly monitor provider operations or access complex technical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If detailed monitoring of service provider activities is implemented, then visibility into service performance is improved, but system complexity and implementation cost deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisibility into service performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is segmented into modular components: activity collection modules for different service types, processing modules for categorizing and validating activities, and visualization modules for displaying information. This segmentation allows the system to handle complex monitoring tasks through simple, independent units that can be configured based on specific needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of directly monitoring all service provider activities in detail, the system creates a simplified representation or copy of service status information on the roadmap. This copy contains essential information about service performance without replicating the full complexity of underlying monitoring infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive tracking of all service activities is implemented, then accuracy of service performance measurement is improved, but data processing requirements and time consumption deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of service performance measurementVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system tracks only the essential service activities needed for performance measurement, rather than all possible activities. By identifying and monitoring just the critical service elements (such as service level agreement compliance, major system changes, and key performance indicators), the system achieves accurate measurements without processing excessive data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary processing of service activity data in real-time or near-real-time, validating, categorizing, and preparing information for display before it is needed. This preliminary action reduces the processing burden when measurements are required and ensures accurate, up-to-date service performance data is ready for immediate use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10536534B2System and method for providing visual feedback in site-related service activity roadmap
Publication Date: 2020.01.14 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US10536534B2 patent drawing
  • US10536534B2 patent drawing
  • US10536534B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes obtaining information associated with a service provider's activities with respect to a computing system, where the service provider's activities include changes to the computing system. The method also includes identifying a specified time period and generating a graphical display containing a service roadmap. The service roadmap identifies one or more of the changes to the computing system that have occurred or will occur within the specified time period. The method further includes, in response to a user selection of one of the changes to the computing system in the service roadmap, updating the graphical display to include additional information about the selected change to the computing system. The characteristics of the service provider's activities could include multiple characteristics related to contractual requirements of a service agreement and multiple characteristics related to performance characteristics of computing devices and computing networks in the computing system.