Service Robot Human-Proximity Response for Non-Disruptive Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing service robots, such as cleaners, often interact with humans in an unpleasant or disruptive manner, failing to adjust their behavior when people are nearby, which can be inconvenient or dangerous.

Innovation Solution

A method for service robots to sense human proximity and adjust their behavior by pausing work, moving away, or changing location to minimize disturbance, and to resume work once the person is no longer present, using sensors like motion detection or video cameras to determine the presence of people and implement appropriate servicing patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the robot continues working without interruption, then productivity is improved, but human comfort and safety deteriorate due to disruptive interactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobot work efficiencyVSAvoiddisturbance to humans
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The robot dynamically adjusts its operational state based on real-time detection of human presence. When a human is detected, the robot transitions from an active working state to a paused or relocated state, and resumes work when the human leaves. This dynamic state adjustment resolves the contradiction by making productivity contingent on human absence while eliminating disturbance during human presence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The robot uses sensors to continuously monitor the environment and detect human presence, creating a feedback loop that informs operational decisions. This feedback mechanism allows the robot to respond adaptively to human presence, pausing or relocating when humans are nearby and resuming work when the area is clear, thus balancing productivity with human comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the robot pauses work when detecting a person, then human comfort is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to work interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisturbance to humansVSAvoidrobot work efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot implements dynamic work pausing based on real-time human presence detection. Rather than continuous interruption, the robot pauses only when necessary (when a human is present) and automatically resumes when the human leaves, minimizing productivity loss while maintaining human comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The robot employs periodic monitoring of the environment for human presence, creating a rhythm of work-pause-work cycles that align with human occupancy patterns. This periodic action allows the robot to maintain productivity during unoccupied periods while ensuring comfort during occupied periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the robot moves away from the person, then human comfort is improved, but task completion time increases due to relocation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisturbance to humansVSAvoidtime to resume work
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The robot dynamically selects between pausing in place or relocating based on the specific situation and type of work being performed. For tasks that can be paused without significant penalty, the robot remains in place. For tasks requiring continuous motion or where relocation is more efficient, the robot moves to a holding position nearby, minimizing time loss while maintaining comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The robot uses intermediate holding positions or pause locations that are close to but not intrusive of human space. These intermediary positions allow the robot to be near its work area without disturbing the human, enabling quick resumption of work when the human leaves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the robot uses sensors to detect humans, then interaction quality is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman interaction capabilityVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot employs multi-functional sensors that serve both human detection and other operational functions. For example, sensors used for navigation and obstacle avoidance are also utilized for detecting human presence, eliminating the need for separate dedicated sensors and reducing overall system complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The robot uses its existing operational sensors and processing capabilities to detect and respond to humans, rather than adding specialized human-detection systems. The robot's existing sensor suite, designed for general navigation and task execution, is leveraged to provide human awareness, reducing complexity while improving interaction quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP2249998B1Methods for real-time interaction with robots
Publication Date: 2013.03.20 SEEGRID CORP
  • EP2249998B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2249998B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2249998B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

In accordance with aspects of the present invention, a service robot and methods for controlling such a robot are provided. In particular, the robot is configured to sense the presence of a person and to take a next action in response to sensing the presence of the person. As examples, the robot could leave the area, await commands from the person, or enter an idle or sleep state or mode until the person leaves.