Service Robot Security and Privacy Architecture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current robotic systems face challenges in gaining consumer acceptance due to security and privacy concerns, particularly when interacting with customers in their homes, where they may collect sensitive information and perform tasks that require trust and oversight.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a robotic solution with advanced security and privacy measures, including authentication protocols, data protection mechanisms, and oversight systems to ensure the robot's trustworthiness and compliance with user-defined privacy settings, such as using anti-virus software, physical verification methods, and third-party monitoring to manage risks and maintain transparency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a robot is deployed to perform tasks in a customer's home, then the robot's functionality and service capability are improved, but security and privacy risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobot service capabilityVSAvoidsecurity and privacy risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the robot system into multiple independent components with distinct security functions: authentication module, encryption module, firewall, intrusion detection system, and monitoring system. Each component operates independently to address specific security concerns while enabling the robot to perform diverse home services.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary security mechanisms between the robot and customer data/systems. These include authentication protocols that mediate access requests, encryption layers that mediate data transmission, and monitoring systems that mediate oversight of robot actions, thereby enabling service capability while mitigating security risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the robot collects and processes customer information, then the service quality and personalization are improved, but the risk of information misuse and theft increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidinformation misuse risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary security actions before the robot accesses or processes customer information. Authentication protocols verify user identity beforehand, encryption is applied to data before storage or transmission, and access permissions are pre-configured based on service requirements. This enables high-quality personalized service while preventing information misuse before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor robot actions and information processing activities. The monitoring system provides real-time feedback on data access patterns, and the intrusion detection system alerts when unusual information processing occurs, enabling immediate corrective action while maintaining service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If authentication and security verification protocols are implemented, then consumer trust and safety are improved, but system complexity and operational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsumer trustVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs security components with multi-functionality to reduce overall system complexity. The authentication module serves multiple purposes: verifying user identity, authorizing robot actions, and logging access events. The encryption system protects both data at rest and data in transit. The monitoring system provides both real-time oversight and post-event analysis capabilities, thereby maintaining consumer trust without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10350757B2Service robot assessment and operation
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 AVAYA INC
  • US10350757B2 patent drawing
  • US10350757B2 patent drawing
  • US10350757B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A customer service robot may be selected, or configured, to address a particular work item. Robots may comprise different functionality due to absent software or hardware or due to existent but worn or non-compliant components. A particular work item may have several means of resolution. A particular resolution path is selected in accord with the ability of a robot. Should no path exist, the robot may be transformed by the addition or installation of hardware and/or software to provide the absent functionality. Resolution paths may also be weighted based on the level of success provided by prior resolution paths and/or the requirement for human involvement. Accordingly, a resolution path may be provided that balances robot capability with the likelihood of success and an appropriate level of human involvement.