Service Selection System Using Probability Presumption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing systems are inefficient in environments with rapidly changing services, requiring frequent user registration and selection of new functions, making it difficult for users to find necessary services easily.

Innovation Solution

An image processing system that includes a service search data transmission unit, a service determination unit, and a service requesting unit, which transmit and select services based on device settings, status, and user operations, using a directory server to provide a list of likely requested services, reducing the number of services presented to the user and enhancing selection efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If all available services are presented to the user for selection, then the user can access any service, but the complexity of service selection increases and the user cannot easily find necessary services

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice availabilityVSAvoidservice selection ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines which services to present to the user based on device settings, status information, and operation history without requiring manual configuration. The service determination unit autonomously filters and selects appropriate services, reducing user burden while maintaining service availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary filtering of services based on device capabilities and usage patterns before presenting them to the user. By pre-determining the subset of relevant services, the system reduces selection complexity while ensuring that necessary services are readily accessible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If new functions are added to the host computer, then the system capabilities increase, but the user must frequently register and select new functions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capabilitiesVSAvoidregistration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The service determination unit automatically identifies and presents new services based on device settings and operation history, eliminating the need for manual registration. The system self-adapts to new functions by analyzing device status and autonomously determining which services to make available to the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses operation history and device status feedback to automatically adapt to new services. By monitoring device settings and usage patterns, the system dynamically determines which new services should be presented, reducing the need for explicit user registration while maintaining relevance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the number of services increases in dynamic environments, then the system becomes more versatile, but the task of selecting necessary services becomes more troublesome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice varietyVSAvoidselection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The service determination unit extracts and presents only the relevant subset of services from the complete service catalog based on device settings, status, and operation history. This extraction process filters out unnecessary services, reducing selection complexity while maintaining access to all services when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system presents a partial list of services that are most relevant to the user's current needs rather than all available services. This partial presentation approach reduces complexity while ensuring that necessary services are included, with the option to access additional services if required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7406270B2Image processing system, image processing device, server and program
Publication Date: 2008.07.29 BROTHER KOGYO KK
  • US7406270B2 patent drawing
  • US7406270B2 patent drawing
  • US7406270B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing system including an image processing device, a service supply unit and an information supply unit is provided. The image processing device includes a service search data transmission unit, a service determination unit, and a service requesting unit. The information supply unit including a service search data reception unit; a presumption unit that presumes a probability of each service based on the service search data received by the service search data reception unit and according to prescribed presumption rules; and a list supply unit that supplies a list generated by extracting services likely to be requested from the service supply unit from all the services executable by the service supply unit and a list generated by sorting the services executable by the service supply unit.