Service-Specific Scheduling Requests for 5G Uplink Latency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current uplink grant based scheduling in 5G New Radio (NR) networks is not sufficiently fast, application-aware, or dynamic, leading to latency and increased signaling overhead.

Innovation Solution

Implementing service-specific scheduling requests (SRs) and periodic cadence reports (PCRs) that allow user equipment (UE) to request resources tailored to specific applications and services, reducing the need for buffer status reports and enhancing resource allocation based on anticipated traffic characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If traditional uplink grant based scheduling is used, then the system maintains general compatibility, but the scheduling speed is slow and latency is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling speedVSAvoiduplink latency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the scheduling request mechanism into multiple SR configurations, each tailored to specific application types, QoS flows, or traffic characteristics. This segmentation allows the system to quickly identify and allocate resources for specific traffic types without going through general scheduling procedures, thereby reducing latency and improving scheduling speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary configuration of multiple SR configurations before actual data transmission occurs. By pre-defining SR configurations for different application types and traffic characteristics, the system can immediately trigger appropriate scheduling requests without needing to negotiate parameters in real-time, thus reducing uplink latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If application-specific SR configurations are implemented, then resource allocation becomes more efficient, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidscheduling mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates SR configurations that serve multiple purposes: they identify application types, indicate QoS requirements, and specify traffic characteristics all in a single configuration structure. This multi-functionality allows the system to handle diverse application requirements without proportionally increasing complexity, as one SR configuration mechanism handles what would otherwise require multiple separate signaling mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the SR configuration to include application type identifiers, QoS flow indicators, and traffic characteristic descriptions. By embedding these parameters within the SR configuration structure, the system achieves application-specific resource allocation without requiring separate signaling procedures for each parameter, thus improving efficiency while controlling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple SR configurations are used for different applications, then scheduling becomes more dynamic and application-aware, but signaling overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication-aware schedulingVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple pieces of information (application type, QoS requirements, traffic characteristics) into a single SR configuration structure. By combining these elements that would otherwise require separate signaling messages, the system achieves application-aware scheduling while minimizing signaling overhead, as one compact configuration carries multiple layers of scheduling information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Loss of time

If buffer status reports are replaced with periodic cadence reports, then resource allocation becomes more anticipatory, but the mechanism becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation response timeVSAvoidreporting mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic cadence reports that provide advance information about upcoming traffic patterns and timing. By reporting cadence information in advance rather than reacting to buffer status after data arrives, the system can proactively allocate resources, reducing response time while the periodic nature of the reporting keeps the mechanism manageable in complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240098772A1Uplink Latency Enhancements
Publication Date: 2024.03.21 APPLE INC
  • US20240098772A1 patent drawing
  • US20240098772A1 patent drawing
  • US20240098772A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A user equipment (UE) configured to receive multiple scheduling request (SR) configurations, wherein each SR configuration is specific to an application, service, quality of service (QoS) flow or set of traffic characteristics, transmit a first type of SR, wherein a plurality of different types of SRs comprising at least the first type of SR and a second type of SR each correspond to a different one of the multiple SR configurations and receive an initial uplink grant for a data transmission in response to the first type of SR, wherein the initial uplink grant indicates one or more uplink resources assigned to the UE by a network based on an application, service, quality of service (QoS) flow or set of traffic characteristics specific to the first type of SR.