Servicer Spacecraft Towing for Satellite Deorbiting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing satellite deorbiting methods, such as carrying propellant onboard for self-deorbit, are costly and limit operational life, and satellite failures can hinder effective collision avoidance and deorbiting.

Innovation Solution

A servicer spacecraft equipped with a robotic payload and various propellant systems, including electric propulsion and refillable fuel options, actively deorbits or supports self-deorbiting of client satellites by towing them to low orbits or installing auxiliary propellant modules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If satellite carries propellant onboard for self-deorbit, then deorbiting capability is achieved, but operational life is limited and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeorbiting capabilityVSAvoidoperational life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The deorbiting function is extracted from the satellite itself and performed by a separate servicer spacecraft. The servicer carries the propellant and performs the deorbiting maneuver, while the satellite can maintain its full operational propellant load for mission purposes without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

A servicer spacecraft acts as an intermediary between the satellite and the deorbiting process. The servicer captures the satellite, provides the propellant for deorbiting, and executes the orbital decay maneuver, allowing the satellite to maintain full operational capability throughout its mission life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If satellite carries propellant onboard for self-deorbit, then deorbiting capability is achieved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeorbiting capabilityVSAvoidpropellant mass
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The propellant requirement for deorbiting is extracted from the satellite's mass budget and transferred to the servicer spacecraft. This allows the satellite to be launched with minimal or zero deorbit propellant, reducing launch mass and cost, while the servicer provides the necessary propellant from its own supply.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The servicer spacecraft provides a universal deorbiting service that can be applied to multiple satellites. A single servicer can service multiple satellites throughout its operational life, amortizing the propellant cost across multiple missions rather than requiring each satellite to carry its own dedicated deorbit propellant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If active deorbiting is performed to ensure collision avoidance, then safety is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidservicing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The servicer spacecraft autonomously performs the deorbiting maneuver after capturing the satellite. The servicer's robotic system automatically captures, secures, and executes the deorbiting burn without requiring continuous human intervention, reducing operational complexity while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient, cost-effective, and controlled satellite deorbiting, minimizing operational constraints and ensuring collision avoidance, with flexible options for varying satellite constellation needs.

Implementation Method 1

The servicer spacecraft includes a set of electric propulsion (EP) thrusters, a set of power processing units (PPUs), and ion propulsion propellant fuel capacity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric propulsion: Electromagnetic Propulsion

Implementation Method 2

The servicer spacecraft includes ion propulsion propellant fuel capacity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon propulsion: Electromagnetic Propulsion

Implementation Method 3

The auxiliary propellant module may be a high pressure storable propellant or an ion propulsion propellant module

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHigh pressure storable propellant:

Implementation Method 4

The auxiliary propellant module may be a high pressure storable propellant or an ion propulsion propellant module, such as a Kr propellant module

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon propulsion: Electromagnetic Propulsion

Data Source

PatentEP4617177A1Systems and methods for satellite deorbiting using a servicer spacecraft
Publication Date: 2025.09.17 MACDONALD DETTWILER & ASSOC INC
  • EP4617177A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4617177A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4617177A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems and methods for servicing a client spacecraft are provided. The client spacecraft is in a client spacecraft orbit. The method includes: providing (702) a servicer spacecraft in a servicer spacecraft operating orbit, wherein the servicer spacecraft is equipped to phase between orbital planes and to rendezvous with the client spacecraft; establishing (704) contact between the servicer spacecraft and the client spacecraft; performing (706) a servicing operation on the client spacecraft with the servicer spacecraft; and releasing (708) the client spacecraft from the servicer spacecraft.