Serving apparatus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing serving robots face challenges with limited food carrying capacity, instability of food containers of various sizes and shapes, and hygiene issues when collecting used containers, which affect efficiency and customer comfort.

Innovation Solution

A serving apparatus with a driving unit and a body unit having an open lateral side, accommodating a body container for food or food containers, and a dedicated tray system for drinks, allowing for increased capacity and stability, and minimizing exposure of used containers through a single round trip while maintaining hygiene.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a robot arm is used to hold the tray, then the tray can be carried, but the configuration becomes complicated and manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetray carrying capabilityVSAvoidrobot arm configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the robot arm component entirely and replaces it with a simple tray placement structure on the robot body. The tray is held by friction and gravity alone, eliminating the need for complex mechanical arms while maintaining tray carrying capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The robot body is divided into functional sections: a upper body unit with tray placement area, a lower body unit with storage compartment, and a driving unit. This segmentation allows the tray to be placed on the upper body while food containers are stored in the lower body, simplifying the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If a robot arm with tray is used, then food can be served, but the likelihood of service failure increases due to control errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood serving capabilityVSAvoidservice stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By removing the robot arm and its associated control systems, the patent eliminates control errors related to arm movement, tray positioning, and food container handling. The simplified friction-based holding mechanism is inherently more reliable than active control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The lower body unit includes a storage compartment that accommodates food containers before serving. This pre-positioning reduces the risk of dropping or spilling during transport, as containers are securely stored rather than precariously balanced on a tray.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Device complexity

If the tray is placed on the accommodation structure without fastening, then the structure is simplified, but the tray may fall out during vibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation structureVSAvoidtray stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The tray placement area on the upper body unit is designed with friction surfaces and geometric constraints that pre-prevent the tray from sliding or falling during robot movement. The tray is positioned and secured by the structure itself before any vibration or movement occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The upper body unit features a specifically designed tray placement area with increased friction coefficient and appropriate depth, creating local stability without requiring fastening mechanisms throughout the entire structure. This localized design maintains simplicity while ensuring tray security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Device complexity

If food containers of various sizes and shapes are placed on a flat tray, then the tray is simple, but it is impossible to accommodate them stably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetray structureVSAvoidfood container stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent separates the tray function from the storage function. The upper body unit tray handles only lightweight items, while the lower body unit storage compartment accommodates food containers of various sizes and shapes. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific purpose.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes vertical space by placing the tray on the upper body and the storage compartment in the lower body. This three-dimensional arrangement allows stable accommodation of various container sizes without requiring a complex flat tray design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11472459B2Serving apparatus
Publication Date: 2022.10.18 BEAR ROBOTICS INC
  • US11472459B2 patent drawing
  • US11472459B2 patent drawing
  • US11472459B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a serving apparatus. According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a serving apparatus, comprising: a driving unit; a body unit connecting to the driving unit and having a top side and an interior, wherein at least a part of a lateral side of the body unit is open; and a body container disposed in the interior of the body unit, wherein food or food containers are placed at the body container and the top side.