Serving Robot Tray Leveling Under Acceleration and Slopes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current serving robots face challenges in maintaining the horizontality of the loading part during acceleration, deceleration, and movement on slopes, which can lead to instability and spills when carrying food items, and in efficiently interacting with users to receive orders and serve food.

Innovation Solution

A serving robot with a main body, an arm rotatably connected to both the main body and a loading part, and a processor that controls the arm and loading part to maintain horizontality based on acceleration, deceleration, and tilt information, using sensors and motors to adjust the position and orientation of the loading part, including a tray and display, to ensure stable food delivery and user interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the arm is rotated during acceleration or deceleration, then the robot can maintain horizontality of the loading part, but the control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehorizontality of loading partVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The processor continuously receives acceleration and tilt information from sensors, dynamically adjusts arm rotation and loading part orientation in real-time based on detected motion states, creating a closed-loop control system that maintains horizontality while adapting to changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static positioning to dynamic adjustment by rotating the arm and loading part based on real-time acceleration and tilt data, allowing the robot to adapt its configuration during movement to maintain stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the robot moves quickly to serve food, then productivity increases, but food stability decreases due to acceleration and deceleration effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood delivery speedVSAvoidfood stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The processor proactively rotates the arm and loading part in opposition to detected acceleration and deceleration forces before food instability occurs, preventing spills and maintaining food stability during rapid movement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary adjustments to arm and loading part orientation based on predicted motion dynamics, preparing the system in advance for acceleration or deceleration events to maintain food stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the robot interacts with users to receive orders, then service quality improves, but the time required for food delivery increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction capabilityVSAvoidfood delivery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The robot performs interactions at periodic intervals or at predetermined locations along its delivery path, allowing it to communicate with users without continuously stopping, thereby maintaining service quality while minimizing delivery time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures stable food delivery by maintaining the loading part's horizontality during movement and interaction with users, enhancing the robot's ability to serve food efficiently and interact with customers by adjusting its position and orientation based on detected changes in velocity and tilt.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor configured to detect acceleration or deceleration of the main body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration detection: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

based on the first information, control the driver part to rotate the arm in the first direction or in the second direction to offset an effect of the acceleration or deceleration of the main body in the loading part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia: Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS20240100711A1Serving robot and control method thereof
Publication Date: 2024.03.28 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20240100711A1 patent drawing
  • US20240100711A1 patent drawing
  • US20240100711A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A serving robot and a control method thereof are disclosed. The serving robot includes a main body, a loading part on which food is loaded, an arm of which one end is rotatably connected to the main body, and the other end is rotatably connected to the loading part, a driving part, and at least one processor, wherein the at least one processor is configured to control the driving part so that the loading part maintains horizontality at the time of a forward rotation or a backward rotation of the arm.