Unified Servo Control Circuit Mode Transition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Power electronics devices, such as DC/DC converters, experience undesirable transients during mode transitions, leading to high transient input current and voltage ripple, which can damage components and cause instability, especially during overcurrent conditions and startup with capacitive loads.

Innovation Solution

A control circuit with a common control node and sub-control circuits that include capacitive feedback and switches, allowing for rapid handover between control modes by charging feedback capacitors to a regulation voltage instead of a power rail voltage, reducing the time required for mode transitions and minimizing transient effects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional control mode switching is used, then the power converter can switch between CV and CC modes, but high transient input current and voltage ripple occur during mode transitions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemode switching capabilityVSAvoidtransient input current and voltage ripple
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback capacitor is pre-charged to the future control node voltage level before the mode transition occurs. This preliminary action ensures that when the transition happens, the capacitor is already at the correct voltage level, eliminating the transient current spike and voltage ripple that would otherwise occur during the switching event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A dedicated feedback capacitor is introduced as an intermediary element between the control node and ground. This capacitor acts as a voltage buffer that smooths the transition between control modes by maintaining a continuous voltage reference, thereby reducing harmful transients in the input current and output voltage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Power

If feedback capacitor is charged to power rail voltage, then the capacitor stores maximum energy, but extended handover time and delayed mode transition occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy storage in feedback capacitorVSAvoidhandover time between control modes
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the voltage parameter to which the feedback capacitor is charged, not to the maximum power rail voltage, but to the specific control node voltage level that will be active after the mode transition. This parameter optimization reduces the voltage swing required during switching, thereby reducing the handover time while still providing sufficient energy for stable control during the transition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If rapid mode transition is achieved, then transient effects are minimized, but control precision and stability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemode transition timeVSAvoidcontrol stability during transition
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback capacitor is directly connected to the control node, which is the same node that provides feedback to the controller. This creates a natural feedback mechanism where the capacitor voltage automatically adjusts to match the control node voltage, ensuring that the transition is both rapid and stable. The feedback loop continuously monitors and corrects any deviations, maintaining control precision throughout the transition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Significantly reduces transient input current and output voltage ripple during mode transitions, ensuring component safety and stability, and provides a soft startup process that prevents overshoot, thereby enhancing the reliability of power electronics devices.

Implementation Method 1

each of the sub-control circuits include a capacitive feedback circuit having a feedback input electrically coupled to the common control node

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS9831768B2Dynamic maneuvering configuration for multiple control modes in a unified servo system
Publication Date: 2017.11.28 CRANE ELECTRONICS INC
  • US9831768B2 patent drawing
  • US9831768B2 patent drawing
  • US9831768B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods that provide control circuits having multiple sub-control inputs that control operation of a power electronics device (e.g., a power converter). Each of the multiple sub-control inputs are output from a separate sub-control circuit that includes a feedback circuit having an input tied to a common control node. The common control node is coupled to an input of a controller (e.g., a PWM controller). Outputs of each of the sub-control circuits are coupled to the common control node by a respective switch (e.g., diode, transistor, etc.) so that each of the sub-control circuits may be selectively coupled to the common control node to provide a control signal to a controller. Since components of each of the feedback compensations circuits are biased at a regulation voltage instead of a higher power supply voltage, the control circuit may switch between control modes with minimal delay.