Servo Feedforward Compensation for Corner Tracking and Vibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing servo control devices face challenges in independently designing gain and phase characteristics for feedforward compensation, leading to vibration and trajectory errors, especially at corners and sudden changes in reference trajectory directions.

Innovation Solution

A servo control device with a feedforward compensation unit that uses a transfer function with unstable zeros, allowing for independent design of gain and phase characteristics, and includes a feedforward characteristics setting unit to determine parameters that minimize trajectory errors and vibration by shaping the position, velocity, and torque feedforward signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a filter is used to smooth the command signal locally on a time basis to suppress machine vibration, then vibration is suppressed, but a trajectory error such as an inward turning error occurs because the response trajectory deviates from the reference trajectory

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine vibrationVSAvoidtrajectory error
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies preliminary action by estimating the future end effector position at a predetermined sampling time ahead and using this estimated position to calculate the correction amount in advance. This allows the correction to be applied proactively before the trajectory error occurs, rather than reactively after the error has manifested. The feedforward compensation unit calculates the correction amount based on the estimated future position, enabling the system to anticipate and correct trajectory deviations before they affect the actual position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements feedback by using the estimated end effector position to calculate a correction amount that is fed back to adjust the command position. The feedforward compensation unit continuously estimates the future position, calculates the deviation from the reference trajectory, and generates a correction signal that is applied to the command position. This closed-loop estimation and correction mechanism ensures that trajectory errors are systematically compensated while maintaining vibration suppression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If the gain characteristic and phase characteristic of feedforward compensation are designed together, then the design process is simpler, but it is impossible to independently optimize both characteristics to minimize both trajectory error and vibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign complexityVSAvoidtrajectory accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies segmentation by separating the feedforward compensation transfer function into independent gain and phase characteristic components. The feedforward compensation unit is designed with distinct parameters for gain characteristic (affecting trajectory accuracy) and phase characteristic (affecting vibration suppression). This segmentation allows each characteristic to be optimized independently through separate parameter adjustments, enabling simultaneous minimization of both trajectory error and vibration without compromising design simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If correction amount is calculated using a perpendicular from estimated end effector position to reference trajectory, then trajectory error can be minimized, but in cases where multiple perpendiculars exist (e.g., at corner portions), the correction amount cannot be uniquely determined and may change sharply causing vibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory error minimizationVSAvoidmachine vibration
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies dynamics by using a dynamic estimation model that continuously predicts the future end effector position based on the system's response characteristics. Instead of using static geometric perpendicular calculations that may yield multiple solutions at corner portions, the dynamic estimation provides a unique, continuous correction amount that smoothly varies with the reference trajectory. This dynamic approach ensures that even at corner portions where multiple perpendiculars could exist, the correction amount remains uniquely determined and changes smoothly, preventing vibration while minimizing trajectory error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11630425B2Servo control device
Publication Date: 2023.04.18 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US11630425B2 patent drawing
  • US11630425B2 patent drawing
  • US11630425B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A servo control device for controlling an end effector of a machine to follow a set reference trajectory by driving the machine using an actuator includes a feedforward compensation unit that performs feedforward compensation by outputting a feedforward signal for controlling the actuator on the basis of a position command signal inputted thereto, wherein input-output characteristics represented in a continuous-time system of the feedforward compensation unit are expressed by a transfer function having unstable zeros, and a step response of the feedforward compensation unit has an initial undershoot.