Servo Loop Degradation Detection in Jet Engine Actuators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current monitoring methods for servo loops in turbojet engine actuation systems are ineffective in detecting degradations early enough to prevent inefficiency or failure, often leading to late maintenance and unnecessary operations.

Innovation Solution

A method and device for monitoring servo loops in turbojet engine actuation systems that estimate various parameters, such as cylinder positions and autoregressive model coefficients, to detect and locate degradations by analyzing signatures derived from these parameters, allowing for predictive maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional monitoring methods are used, then the system structure remains simple, but degradation detection is too late and maintenance is unnecessary frequent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedegradation detection timingVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system segments the actuation system into multiple components (servovalve, actuators, cylinders) and monitors each separately using dedicated sensors and parameter estimation techniques. This allows targeted detection of degradations in specific components without requiring a complete system overhaul, resolving the contradiction between early detection and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary monitoring and parameter estimation continuously during normal operation to detect degradations before they lead to failure. By estimating parameters like cylinder positions and servovalve control currents in advance and comparing them against expected values, the system identifies degradation trends early, enabling proactive maintenance before the actuation system becomes inoperative.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive monitoring parameters are estimated, then degradation detection accuracy improves, but computational load and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedegradation detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system focuses computational resources on estimating parameters for specific critical components (cylinder positions, servovalve control currents) rather than monitoring all system parameters equally. This localized approach maintains high detection accuracy for degradation-prone components while reducing overall computational burden and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors changes in key parameters (cylinder position deviations, control current variations) over time rather than analyzing absolute values. By tracking parameter trends and deviations from expected behavior, the system achieves accurate degradation detection with reduced computational complexity, as it only needs to detect significant changes rather than process complete parameter sets continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If early maintenance is implemented, then engine availability improves, but unnecessary maintenance operations increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine availabilityVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system continuously compares estimated parameters against expected values and provides feedback on system health status. By analyzing trends in parameter deviations and comparing them against degradation thresholds, the system distinguishes between normal variations and actual degradations, enabling maintenance to be scheduled based on actual condition rather than fixed intervals, thus avoiding unnecessary maintenance while ensuring timely intervention when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2630548B1Method and device for monitoring a feedback loop of a variable-geometry actuator system of a jet engine
Publication Date: 2020.09.09 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • EP2630548B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2630548B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2630548B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The invention relates to a method comprising: estimating monitoring parameters from operating data of the feedback loop; obtaining indicators from the monitoring parameters; determining at least one signature from values of at least one portion of the indicators; and detecting and locating a degradation affecting the feedback loop according to said at least one predetermined signature.