Servo Turning Station Motion Profiles for Energy and Oscillation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in producing electric motor components using punch presses is the inefficient and energy-consuming operation of servo motor-driven turning stations due to varying masses and inertias, leading to suboptimal motion profiles and system oscillations.

Innovation Solution

A method to define target turning acceleration processes for servo motor-driven turning stations, optimizing energy efficiency by determining target and reference parameters to achieve uniform acceleration and deceleration profiles without unnecessary high accelerations, using a 'teach-in' operation to set optimal motion profiles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If high accelerations and decelerations are used to complete the turning increment in available time, then the turning speed is improved, but energy consumption increases and equipment wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturning speedVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts the motion profile of the turning station based on real-time parameters such as sheet pack mass, turning increment size, and available time. The control system adjusts acceleration and deceleration values dynamically rather than using fixed high values, optimizing the balance between turning speed and energy consumption for each specific operating condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the motion parameters (acceleration, deceleration, velocity) of the turning station based on measured or calculated parameters such as sheet pack mass, turning increment, and cycle time. By calculating optimal parameter combinations that satisfy the turning requirement within available time while minimizing energy consumption, the system resolves the contradiction between speed and energy use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If high accelerations are used to complete the turning increment in available time, then the turning speed is improved, but system oscillations occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturning speedVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically determines acceleration and deceleration values that are high enough to complete the turning increment within available time but low enough to avoid exciting system oscillations. This dynamic adjustment based on actual system conditions maintains stability while achieving required turning speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from sensors measuring actual position, velocity, and potentially vibration/oscillation levels to adjust the motion profile in real-time. This feedback mechanism allows the system to reduce acceleration values when oscillations are detected, preventing instability while maintaining turning speed where possible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If iterative adjustment of turning stations is performed to match dynamic characteristics, then the manufacturing precision is improved, but the time required for setup increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturning accuracyVSAvoidsetup time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary characterization of the turning station's dynamic behavior through reference acceleration runs before actual production. By pre-determining the relationship between drive torque and turning acceleration, and pre-calculating optimal motion profiles for different sheet pack masses and turning increments, the system eliminates the need for time-consuming iterative adjustments during setup while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system automatically calculates and configures optimal motion profiles based on input parameters such as sheet pack mass, turning increment, and available time. This self-configuration capability eliminates the need for operator intervention and iterative manual adjustment, reducing setup time while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If the motion profile is not specifically set for each production job, then the ease of operation is improved, but energy consumption increases due to unnecessarily high accelerations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines optimal motion profiles without requiring operator intervention or expertise. The control system inputs basic parameters (sheet pack mass, turning increment, available time) and automatically calculates the energy-optimal acceleration and deceleration values, making the system easy to operate while minimizing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically changes motion parameters (acceleration, deceleration, velocity) based on production-specific conditions such as sheet pack mass and turning increment requirements. This automatic parameter optimization maintains ease of operation while eliminating unnecessarily high accelerations that would increase energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12447522B2Method for operating a servo motor driven turning station of a stacking tool for a punch press
Publication Date: 2025.10.21 BRUDERER AG
  • US12447522B2 patent drawing
  • US12447522B2 patent drawing
  • US12447522B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a servo motor (10) driven turning station (5, 6, 7) of a stacking tool for a punch press includes the following steps: determining a target turning acceleration curve of the turning station (5, 6, 7) in the acceleration phase (A) of the turning increment (D); carrying out a reference acceleration run of the turning station (5, 6, 7); determining during the reference acceleration run the reference angular velocity (ωref) of the turning station (5, 6, 7); determining from the target turning acceleration curve the target angular velocity (ωsoll); calculating a target drive torque of the servo motor, at which the target angular velocity (ωsoll) results, from the relationship, known from the reference acceleration run; and accelerating the turning station (5, 6, 7) with the servo motor (10) in the acceleration phase (A).