Aircraft Servocontrol Oscillation Detection via Residual Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current monitoring systems for oscillatory failures in aircraft servocontrol subsystems are not robust and lack universal applicability, often requiring costly structural reinforcements and providing limited coverage, as they are dependent on specific hardware, piloting laws, and computer systems, making them ineffective across different aircraft types.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that automatically detect oscillatory failures by estimating a theoretical position using a model, computing residual values, and comparing them to thresholds, with filtering to eliminate noise and spurious signals, allowing for detection of minimal amplitude failures across various frequencies and types of aircraft.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If usual monitoring solutions are implemented, then detection of oscillatory failures is provided, but the solutions are dependent on specific hardware, piloting laws, and computer systems, limiting their applicability to different aircraft types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability to different aircraft typesVSAvoidrobustness of detection system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal monitoring method that can be applied to any aircraft type with electrical flight controls. The solution uses a standardized approach based on comparing actual actuator commands with modeled actuator behavior, making it independent of specific hardware configurations, piloting laws, or computer systems. This single method replaces multiple aircraft-specific solutions while maintaining reliable detection across all platforms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If complete coverage of oscillatory failures is implemented, then all failure modes are detected, but excessively costly structural reinforcements are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of failure detectionVSAvoidcost of structural reinforcements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements monitoring that detects oscillatory failures above a predetermined amplitude threshold. Rather than providing complete coverage of all possible failure amplitudes, the system focuses on detecting failures that exceed the threshold where structural reinforcement would be necessary. This partial coverage approach avoids costly reinforcements by detecting problems early enough that existing structures can handle the loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical structural reinforcements with an electronic monitoring and detection system. Instead of reinforcing aircraft structures to withstand all possible oscillatory failures, the system uses computer-based monitoring to detect oscillatory behavior and alert operators, substituting mechanical solutions with electronic detection and control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If monitoring systems detect minimal amplitude oscillations, then comprehensive failure detection is achieved, but detection time increases requiring more periods for confirmation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of minimal amplitude failuresVSAvoiddetection time in number of periods
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback mechanisms where the monitoring system continuously compares actual actuator commands with modeled commands and accumulates evidence of oscillatory behavior over multiple periods. The system provides feedback loops that confirm oscillatory patterns before triggering alerts, ensuring minimal amplitude failures are detected accurately while maintaining reasonable detection time through iterative verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7725224B2Method and device for detecting oscillatory failures in a position servocontrol subsystem of an aircraft control surface
Publication Date: 2010.05.25 AIRBUS OPERATIONS (SAS)
  • US7725224B2 patent drawing
  • US7725224B2 patent drawing
  • US7725224B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and device for detecting oscillatory failures in a position servocontrol subsystem of an aircraft control surface. The detection device includes a estimation unit for estimating, using a control surface control instruction, a theoretical position corresponding to a reference position of the control surface, a computing unit for computing the difference between this theoretical position and an actual position measured by a sensor so as to form a residual value, and a comparison unit for comparing this residual value to a threshold value and making a count of the overshoots of this threshold value in order to detect an oscillatory failure.