Servomotor Control Device Inertia Ratio Gain Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing servomotor control systems face limitations in raising responsiveness in velocity control loops due to delays, which restrict the increase of integral gain when proportional gain is increased, especially in multi-rate systems with different calculation cycles for integral and proportional terms.

Innovation Solution

A servomotor control device and method that adjusts the integral and proportional gains based on the ratio of total machine inertia to rotor inertia, with the integral gain set to a value smaller than the square of the velocity gain magnification according to delay time, and the proportional gain adjusted by the difference in calculation cycles, allowing for higher responsiveness without compromising damping characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the integral gain is increased by the square of the proportional gain magnification to increase responsiveness, then the responsiveness is improved, but the velocity gain is limited at the boundary due to delay time in the velocity control loop

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveresponsivenessVSAvoidvelocity gain stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter relationship from integral gain = (proportional gain magnification)² to integral gain = (proportional gain magnification)^(2-γτ), where γ is a positive constant and τ is the delay time. This parameter modification allows the integral gain to account for delay effects, enabling higher velocity gain magnification while maintaining stability in the presence of delays in the velocity control loop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a dynamic adjustment mechanism where the exponent of the integral gain relationship is modified based on the delay time characteristics of the system. This dynamic approach allows the control system to adapt to the presence of delays, enabling higher responsiveness while preventing oscillatory overshoot that would occur with fixed gain relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If the calculation cycle for the integral term is made longer to reduce computation load, then the device complexity is reduced, but the responsiveness of the velocity control loop deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputation loadVSAvoidresponsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the velocity control loop into two different calculation cycles: a first calculation cycle for the proportional term and a second calculation cycle for the integral term. This segmentation allows the proportional term to be calculated more frequently for high responsiveness, while the integral term is calculated less frequently to reduce computation load, with the modified gain relationship compensating for the slower integral update rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Speed

If the proportional gain magnification is increased to improve responsiveness, then the responsiveness is improved, but oscillatory overshoot occurs due to delay time in the velocity control loop

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveresponsivenessVSAvoiddamping characteristic
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the parameter relationship between integral gain and proportional gain magnification from a fixed square relationship to a delay-compensated relationship with exponent (2-γτ). This parameter change allows higher proportional gain magnification to be applied without causing oscillatory overshoot, as the integral gain is adjusted to account for the delay time, thereby maintaining damping characteristics even with increased responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by pre-calculating the delay-compensated gain relationship before implementing the control. The exponent (2-γτ) is determined based on the known delay time characteristics, allowing the integral gain to be set in advance to counteract the destabilizing effects of delay, preventing oscillatory overshoot before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS9893662B1Servomotor control device, servomotor control method, and computer readable recording medium
Publication Date: 2018.02.13 FANUC LTD
  • US9893662B1 patent drawing
  • US9893662B1 patent drawing
  • US9893662B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A servomotor control device includes a torque command creation part for creating a torque command value for driving a servomotor. The torque command creation part includes a proportional gain part and an integral gain part. An integral gain is set as a value calculated by multiplying an initial value, by a ratio J/Jm of total inertia of a machine relative to rotor inertia of the servomotor, and a value set smaller than the square of a velocity gain magnification according to delay time of the velocity control loop. A proportional gain is a value calculated by adding a value according to a difference in calculation cycle between the integral term and the proportional term, and the integral gain, to a value calculated by multiplying an initial value by the ratio J/Jm and the velocity gain magnification.