Setpoint-Driven Air Mover Control for Thermal Lag Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional PID closed-loop control systems for air movers in information handling systems are prone to oscillation and excessive lag, leading to unstable operation and inadequate thermal management.

Innovation Solution

A feedback controller system that calculates a difference between a setpoint and a measured process value, generating a controller driving signal, and compares this difference to a previous setpoint value to determine if a significant change has occurred, outputting a setpoint driving signal if the change is substantial, thereby bypassing traditional feedback control and reducing lag.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional PID closed-loop control is used to control air mover operation, then the system provides continuous feedback control, but the system becomes prone to oscillation and excessive lag

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol stabilityVSAvoidresponse lag
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the feedback control mechanism from the traditional PID loop and replaces it with a direct setpoint-based control approach. The controller compares the measured process value to a setpoint and directly adjusts the air mover operation without the iterative feedback calculations that cause lag, thereby eliminating excessive response time while maintaining control stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using feedback from the measured process value to adjust the control signal (traditional PID approach), the patent inverts the control logic by using the setpoint value as the primary control reference. The controller directly responds to setpoint changes and adjusts the air mover accordingly, reversing the traditional cause-effect relationship in feedback control and eliminating oscillation issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Speed

If traditional PID control is used with high gain for faster response, then response speed improves, but oscillation increases and system becomes unstable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidcontrol stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by having the controller proactively respond to setpoint changes before the process value deviates significantly. When a setpoint change is detected, the controller immediately adjusts the air mover operation in the anticipated direction, eliminating the need for high gain feedback that would otherwise be required to achieve fast response, thereby maintaining both speed and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If PID control parameters are tuned to reduce oscillation, then stability improves, but response time increases and lag becomes excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol stabilityVSAvoidthermal management efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a setpoint-based control mechanism as an intermediary between the temperature sensor input and the air mover control output. This intermediary directly translates setpoint changes into control actions without requiring iterative PID calculations, thereby achieving both rapid thermal response and stable operation, improving overall thermal management efficiency without compromising stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10310573B2Systems and methods for control of a closed-loop system
Publication Date: 2019.06.04 DELL PROD LP
  • US10310573B2 patent drawing
  • US10310573B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure, a system may include a feedback controller and a comparator. The feedback controller may be configured to, based on a setpoint value and a measured process value calculate a first difference between the setpoint value and the measured process value and generate a controller driving signal based on the first difference. The comparator may be configured to compare a second difference between the setpoint value and a previous setpoint value to a predetermined threshold, determine if a magnitude of the second difference is greater than the predetermined threshold, output as an output driving signal the controller driving signal if the magnitude is not greater than the predetermined threshold, and output as the output driving signal a setpoint driving signal if the magnitude is greater than the predetermined threshold, the setpoint value based on the setpoint value independent of the measured process value.