Severity Vector Generation for User Affliction Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems are inefficient in predicting and managing user afflictions due to their dynamic and unpredictable nature, leading to inadequate amelioration strategies as afflictions evolve and change.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize machine-learning processes to identify user afflictions by analyzing user status data, generating affliction classifiers, effect enumerations, and severity vectors, which are then transmitted to remote devices for proactive symptom prediction and complication management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If machine-learning processes are used to generate affliction classifiers, effect enumerations, and severity vectors, then prediction accuracy of user afflictions is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the affliction prediction process into distinct machine-learning processes: an affliction ML process that generates classifiers from user status data, an effect ML process that generates effect enumerations from training sets, and a severity ML process that calculates severity vectors. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-training machine-learning models using training sets before actual prediction. Affliction classifiers are trained on user status data, effect enumerations are trained on affliction state-result correlations, and severity vectors are trained on effect-enumeration to status correlations. This preliminary training enables accurate real-time predictions without complex runtime computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If multiple machine-learning processes are implemented for real-time affliction prediction, then prediction timeliness is improved, but computational resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction timelinessVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs all computationally intensive machine-learning training operations in advance using training sets. Affliction classifiers, effect enumerations, and severity vectors are pre-computed and stored. During real-time operation, the system only needs to retrieve and apply these pre-trained models to user status data, dramatically reducing computational resource consumption while maintaining prediction timeliness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If comprehensive user status analysis is performed to identify all potential afflictions, then detection completeness is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection completenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments detection into multiple specialized machine-learning processes, each handling specific aspects of affliction detection. The affliction ML process identifies potential afflictions, the effect ML process enumerates possible effects, and the severity ML process ranks them by urgency. This segmented approach maintains comprehensive detection while enabling parallel processing to reduce overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional sequential mechanical analysis methods with parallel machine-learning processes. Multiple ML models operate simultaneously on user status data, each contributing to the comprehensive detection of afflictions. This substitution enables comprehensive analysis to be performed in parallel rather than sequentially, significantly reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12087443B2System and method for transmitting a severity vector
Publication Date: 2024.09.10 KPN INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US12087443B2 patent drawing
  • US12087443B2 patent drawing
  • US12087443B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for presenting a severity vector includes a computing device configured to obtain a user status from a remote device, identify a user affliction as a function of a user status, generate an effect enumeration as a function of the affliction, wherein generating includes receiving an affliction training set correlating at least a first element of an affliction state and at least a first affliction result and generating an effect enumeration as a function of the affliction training set using an affliction machine-learning process, wherein the affliction machine-learning process is trained using the affliction training set, calculate a severity vector, and transmit the severity score on the remote device.