Stratigraphic Forward Model Calibration Using Escape Clauses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Stratigraphic Forward Modelling (SFM) tools face challenges in calibration due to their tendency to converge to a single minimum, especially when dealing with complex and multimodal error functions, leading to inefficiencies and potential trapping in local minima, which complicates the inversion of geological data.

Innovation Solution

A method using a conditional sampling algorithm with explicit escape clauses to identify and prevent oversampling of local minima and admissible solutions, allowing the algorithm to explore other regions of the solution space by defining error thresholds and neighborhoods, thereby promoting a multi-modal inversion approach.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a conventional Neighborhood Algorithm is used for SFM calibration, then the algorithm can find optimal solutions, but it tends to converge to a single minimum and get trapped in local minima

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration accuracyVSAvoidsolution space exploration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The algorithm dynamically adjusts the sampling process by introducing escape clauses that activate when local minima are detected. The sampling strategy transitions from intensive local sampling to broader exploration when stagnation is detected, making the search process adaptive rather than static

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameter sampling strategy by introducing explicit escape clauses that modify the sampling distribution. When a local minimum is detected through the local minima escape clause, the algorithm changes parameters to sample from broader regions, thereby escaping the trapped state and continuing the search for admissible solutions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If manual trial and error calibration is used, then the process is simple to understand, but it is time consuming and prone to subjective bias

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration simplicityVSAvoidcalibration efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The algorithm performs self-calibration by automatically detecting local minima and triggering escape clauses without human intervention. The system serves itself by monitoring its own performance and autonomously adjusting the sampling strategy to escape stagnation and continue searching for admissible solutions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements feedback mechanisms where the algorithm continuously monitors the error function and sampling distribution. When feedback indicates convergence to a local minimum (through the local minima escape clause conditions), the system adjusts its behavior by changing the sampling strategy to explore other regions of the solution space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Power

If deterministic gradient descent is used for inversion, then the approach is computationally efficient, but it converges to a single global minimum and cannot handle multimodal error functions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidmultimodal function handling
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention adds a temporal dimension to the sampling process by implementing phases of intensive local sampling followed by escape clauses that broaden the search. This dimensional addition allows the algorithm to transition between exploitation and exploration, handling multimodal error functions while maintaining computational efficiency through the structured escape mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10365403B2Automated calibration of a stratigraphic forward modelling (SFM) tool using a neighborhood algorithm with explicit escape clauses
Publication Date: 2019.07.30 SHELL USA INC
  • US10365403B2 patent drawing
  • US10365403B2 patent drawing
  • US10365403B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A modified direct search Neighborhood Algorithm (NA), similar to genetic or evolutionary algorithms, is used for automatic calibration of Stratigraphic Forward Models (SFM) to data constraints. The modified NA comprises explicit escape clauses from local minima and admissible solutions, thereby preventing a natural tendency of conventional NAs to converge and oversample a single minimum. The density of models in parameter space is used to define local minima. Admissible solutions are defined by considering error thresholds taking into account that SFM may be imperfect and that calibration constraints may be uncertain. The modified NA algorithm obtains a plurality of geological scenarios that agree with the data, and which can be used for further analysis and prediction.