Shader Texture Instruction Demotion for Resource Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing graphics shaders face performance limitations, with texture projective instructions consuming more resources and potentially slowing down shader processing, making it difficult to meet increasing demands for visual effects and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The method involves demoting texture projective instructions into non-projective instructions when the texture projective parameter q is equal to one across a polygon, allowing for efficient execution on parallel interpolation hardware, thereby optimizing shader processing operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If texture projective instructions are executed to maintain visual accuracy and perspective correctness, then rendering quality is improved, but processing speed and resource consumption deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverendering qualityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the execution parameter of texture instructions based on the q-value (projective parameter). When q=1.0, the instruction is executed as a standard texture lookup; when q≠1.0, it is executed as a projective texture lookup. This dynamic parameter adjustment allows the system to optimize between rendering quality and processing speed based on the specific rendering scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The shader execution model is made dynamic by allowing texture instructions to be demoted from projective to non-projective based on runtime conditions. The system dynamically adapts the instruction type according to the q-value calculated during shader compilation or execution, enabling flexible optimization of the rendering pipeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If texture projective instructions are executed to handle complex visual effects, then visual effects capability is improved, but hardware resource consumption deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual effects capabilityVSAvoidhardware resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial projective texture handling by only executing projective texture instructions when necessary (when q≠1.0). For cases where q=1.0, standard texture instructions are used instead. This partial application of the more resource-intensive projective handling approach optimizes the balance between visual effects capability and hardware resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The execution path is changed based on the q-value parameter. By monitoring whether the projective parameter q equals 1.0, the system dynamically selects between resource-efficient standard texture instructions and resource-intensive projective texture instructions, optimizing hardware utilization while maintaining visual effects capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If all texture instructions are executed as projective to ensure correctness, then rendering accuracy is improved, but shader execution time deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverendering accuracyVSAvoidshader execution time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies projective texture handling partially only when the q-value indicates it is necessary (q≠1.0). When q=1.0, standard texture instructions are used which are faster to execute. This partial application ensures rendering accuracy is maintained only when needed, reducing overall shader execution time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The instruction execution type is changed based on the q-value parameter. The system monitors the projective parameter q and dynamically adjusts the texture instruction execution path accordingly, selecting between accurate but slower projective handling and faster standard handling based on the specific rendering context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7825936B1Method and system for texture instruction demotion optimization
Publication Date: 2010.11.02 NVIDIA CORP
  • US7825936B1 patent drawing
  • US7825936B1 patent drawing
  • US7825936B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for optimizing graphics program execution by allowing the sharing of shader resources is disclosed. The method includes accessing a graphics program using a shader pipeline. If a texture projective instruction is included in the graphics program, a determination is made as to whether a texture projective parameter q indicates a non-projective texture. If the texture projective parameter indicates a non-projective texture, the texture projective instruction is demoted and a resulting demoted texture instruction is executed using a plurality of interpolators of the shader pipeline, which requires fewer shader resources.