Shading Evaluation Point Determination for Volumetric Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Volume rendering techniques, such as shaded direct volume rendering (SVR), often suffer from image artifacts like tree-ring artifacts due to discretization effects and volatility in transfer functions, leading to reduced image quality and loss of detail, especially in medical imaging.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a pre-integration method that determines a shading evaluation point within each interval between sampling points based on intensity and opacity values, using a pre-computed most visible point function to smooth color and opacity transitions, and a linear opacity model to refine shading calculations, thereby reducing discretization artifacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If standard volume rendering with fixed sampling grid is used, then rendering speed is maintained, but tree-ring artifacts appear and image quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidtree-ring artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-computes the most visible point for each possible pair of front and back sample opacity values and stores them in a lookup table. During rendering, instead of evaluating shading at fixed grid points, the method queries this pre-computed table to determine the optimal shading evaluation point, thereby eliminating tree-ring artifacts while maintaining rendering speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter used for shading evaluation from fixed spatial grid coordinates to opacity-based positioning. By determining the shading evaluation point based on the opacity values at the front and back of each sample span, the method adapts the evaluation location to the actual visual importance of different regions, eliminating discretization artifacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If shading is evaluated at every sampling point, then image accuracy improves, but computational cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshading accuracyVSAvoidrendering speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most visually important information by identifying and evaluating shading at the single most visible point within each sample span, rather than computing shading at all sampling points. This selective approach maintains image accuracy while dramatically reducing computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent pre-computes and stores the location of the most visible point for each combination of front and back opacity values in a lookup table. During rendering, the method simply queries this table rather than performing complex visibility calculations, thereby achieving high shading accuracy with minimal computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Shape

If transfer function has steep ramps for high contrast, then edge definition improves, but tree-ring artifacts are exacerbated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge definitionVSAvoidtree-ring artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the shading evaluation from fixed spatial positions to opacity-based positions that adapt to the local transfer function characteristics. When steep ramps are present, the most visible point naturally shifts to regions where the transfer function provides meaningful visual information, maintaining edge definition while avoiding artifact-prone regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10964093B2Shading method for volumetric imaging
Publication Date: 2021.03.30 CANON MEDICAL SYST CORP
  • US10964093B2 patent drawing
  • US10964093B2 patent drawing
  • US10964093B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A medical image processing apparatus comprises processing circuitry configured to: obtain volumetric data corresponding to a three dimensional region of a subject; perform a sampling process that comprises sampling the volumetric data at a plurality of sampling points along a plurality of sampling paths; for each of a plurality of intervals between sampling points on sampling paths, determine a position of a shading evaluation point in the interval based on intensity values and/or opacity values for a front sampling point and back sampling point of the interval; and determine a value for a shading parameter at the determined shading evaluation point; and perform a rendering process using the determined values for the shading parameter.