Robot Joint Shaft Brake With Interlocking Wings for Precise Stops

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional braking devices for robot articulations suffer from slip during braking operations, leading to inaccurate regulation of stopping force, which is not suitable for precise control in robot applications.

Innovation Solution

A braking device for a driving shaft featuring a brake ring with cross-shaped locking pieces, rotatable brake wings with locking protrusions, position regulators using solenoids, and elastic members to apply forces, allowing for bi-directional braking with precise control by moving the locking protrusions between interference and non-interference positions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a frictional type brake pad is used for braking operation, then the braking device can be simple in structure, but slip occurs during braking and stopping force cannot be regulated accurately

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestopping force regulation accuracyVSAvoidbraking device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The brake ring is divided into multiple segments with locking pieces, and the brake wing is divided into separate locking protrusions. This segmentation allows precise control of stopping force through selective engagement of locking pieces, eliminating slip while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the frictional mechanical contact system with a mechanical interlocking system using locking pieces and locking protrusions. This substitution eliminates slip by creating direct mechanical engagement instead of relying on friction, achieving accurate stopping force regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If locking protrusions are positioned inside the rotation radius of locking pieces, then the driving shaft can stop rotating, but the braking device cannot achieve bi-directional braking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebi-directional braking capabilityVSAvoidbraking effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking pieces are designed with asymmetric cross-shaped ends that can engage with locking protrusions from either direction. This asymmetry allows the same locking mechanism to effectively brake in both clockwise and counter-clockwise rotations, achieving bi-directional braking while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The locking pieces with cross-shaped ends serve multiple functions: they can be engaged by locking protrusions from either direction to provide braking, and their geometry allows consistent engagement regardless of rotation direction. This multi-functionality enables bi-directional braking without compromising braking effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If conventional frictional brake pads are used, then the braking device can work with large gaps, but slip occurs and precise position maintenance is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition maintenance accuracyVSAvoidbrake gap
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the friction-based mechanical system with a positive engagement mechanical system using locking pieces and locking protrusions. This substitution allows the brake to function effectively with small gaps since the locking mechanism requires minimal clearance for engagement, while achieving precise position maintenance without slip.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate and bi-directional braking with small gaps, ensuring the driving shaft can be stopped and maintained at precise positions, enhancing the braking performance for robot articulations.

Implementation Method 1

elastic members adapted to apply elastic forces to the brake wings rotating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic force: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the position regulators have solenoids adapted to rotate the brake wings according to existence or non-existence of input current or direction of the input current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolenoid electromagnetic actuation: Solenoid

Data Source

PatentUS11313424B2Braking device for driving shaft
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 RAINBOW ROBOTICS INC
  • US11313424B2 patent drawing
  • US11313424B2 patent drawing
  • US11313424B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a braking device for a driving shaft, and the braking device includes: a brake ring coupled to the driving shaft in such a manner as to rotate according to rotation of the driving shaft and having one or more locking pieces with cross-shaped ends; a support frame fixed to an interior of a robot articulation; brake wings rotatable around brake shafts formed on the support frame and having locking protrusions adapted to stop the rotation of the driving shaft through physical interference with the cross-shaped ends of the locking pieces of the brake ring; position regulators adapted to rotate the brake wings to allow positions of the locking protrusions to be moved; and elastic members adapted to apply elastic forces to the brake wings rotating.