Composite Shaft End Fitting With Post-Assembly Interference Preload

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Joining composite structural components to metallic components for axial load transmission in aerospace applications is challenging due to weight and complexity issues, with existing methods requiring additional layers and materials that increase size and stress during assembly.

Innovation Solution

A composite shaft with an end fitting and a preload structure in an interference fit, applied after mounting, to bias the shaft and increase joint strength and fatigue resistance, reducing assembly stress and weight by eliminating flat lands and optimizing tooth angle for efficient force transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If flat lands are provided in the tooth profile to improve wear properties through frictional engagement, then wear resistance is improved, but the length of the end fitting increases significantly resulting in increased weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear resistanceVSAvoidend fitting weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the flat lands from the tooth profile, retaining only the essential cutting teeth for force transmission. This removal of unnecessary components directly reduces the end fitting length and weight while maintaining the core functionality of the joint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If flat lands are provided in the tooth profile to provide frictional engagement and preload, then joint stability is improved, but additional assembly loads and heat generation occur during mounting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint stabilityVSAvoidassembly heat and stress
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The flat lands that cause frictional heating and assembly stress are completely removed from the tooth profile. The invention achieves joint stability through the cutting teeth engagement alone, eliminating the source of harmful thermal and mechanical effects during assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts the potential harm of friction during assembly into a benefit by using the cutting teeth to create a precise interference fit. The controlled material removal during assembly creates optimal contact conditions without the harmful side effects of flat land friction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If additional layers of composite are added to combat assembly loads from pressing or screwing end fittings, then assembly durability is improved, but the size and weight of the component increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly durabilityVSAvoidcomponent weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the need for additional protective composite layers by removing the source of excessive assembly loads (the flat lands). The streamlined tooth profile without flat lands reduces assembly stress to levels that the standard composite shaft can handle without reinforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If the end fitting is made longer to include flat lands, then frictional engagement and preload are improved, but the overall joint complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrictional engagementVSAvoidjoint complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the flat lands from the tooth profile, simplifying the joint design to its essential elements. The frictional engagement function is achieved through the optimized cutting teeth geometry alone, eliminating the need for complex multi-feature profiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a structurally efficient joint with improved strength-to-weight ratio, reduced assembly loads, and enhanced fatigue resistance, allowing for lighter, more efficient composite structures with minimal stress during assembly.

Implementation Method 1

a preload structure arranged to provide a biasing force to bias the composite shaft against the end fitting; wherein the preload structure is in an interference fit with the composite shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterference fit: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

the transmission of forces between the composite shaft and the end fitting is partly through the teeth (helical teeth or axial splines) that are provided on the metal end fitting and cut into the composite shaft, and partly through friction between the composite shaft and the flat metal lands

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11815133B2Composite shaft
Publication Date: 2023.11.14 CROMPTON TECH GROUP
  • US11815133B2 patent drawing
  • US11815133B2 patent drawing
  • US11815133B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A composite shaft with an end fitting mounted on an interface region on at least one end of said shaft, and a preload structure arranged to provide a biasing force to bias the composite shaft against the end fitting; wherein the preload structure is in an interference fit with the composite shaft. The preload structure is applied to the composite shaft in a subsequent operation to the mounting of the end fitting to the shaft.