Rotary Shaft Seal with Static Dam Groove

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Rotary shaft seals experience static oil leaks and air leakage during pressurization testing due to open spiral grooves, which reduces pump rate and leads to oil stagnation and seal failure when attempting to block exit points to mitigate these issues.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic shaft seal design with grooves that stop short of the leading edge, forming a static dam and including an induction and booster zone to capture and pump lubricant back into the lubricant side, controlling fluid pressure to prevent leakage and maintain seal performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the exit points of spiral grooves on the oil side are blocked to prevent static oil leaks and air leakage, then sealing performance is improved, but the pump rate is reduced significantly causing seal performance degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidpump rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The groove is designed with non-uniform cross-sectional area along its length, creating different functional zones: an induction zone with larger cross-section for oil collection and a booster zone with gradually reducing cross-section for pressure buildup. This local variation in geometry allows the groove to simultaneously collect leaked oil effectively and generate sufficient pressure to overcome seal lip opening pressure, resolving the contradiction between preventing leaks and maintaining pump rate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The cross-sectional area of the groove is varied along its length rather than being uniform. The induction zone has a larger cross-sectional area for efficient oil capture, while the booster zone features a gradually reducing cross-sectional area that accelerates fluid pressure growth. This parameter change enables the groove to perform both leakage prevention and maintain adequate pumping capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the pumping groove is blocked 2 to 3 loops toward the air side to reduce static leakage, then sealing performance is improved, but oil stagnation occurs leading to oil coking and seal failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidoil coking
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The groove is designed to extend close to the seal lip on the oil side, extracting the problematic zone where oil stagnation previously occurred. By positioning the groove termination point strategically near the leading edge and using the booster zone geometry, the design ensures continuous oil flow and pressure buildup that prevents stagnation and subsequent coking, while still blocking the harmful effects of static leakage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If the groove cross-sectional area is reduced in the booster zone to increase fluid pressure, then pump rate is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepump rateVSAvoidgroove geometry precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The groove cross-sectional area is designed to vary dynamically along its length rather than being uniform. The booster zone features a gradual reduction in cross-sectional area that naturally accelerates fluid pressure growth as oil moves toward the termination point. This dynamic geometry change achieves high pump rates while the gradual transition reduces manufacturing precision requirements compared to abrupt geometric changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively minimizes static leakage, prevents oil coking, and maintains seal performance by ensuring a consistent lubricant flow, reducing wear and extending seal life.

Implementation Method 1

spiral grooves or built-up ribs (hereinafter collectively referred to as grooves) disposed on the active side of the seal capture the leaked lubricant and hydrodynamically pump the lubricant back into the lubricated side due to relative rotation between the seal and the shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodynamic pumping: Hydrodynamic Cavitation

Implementation Method 2

The fluid pressure inside the groove grows until it reaches a critical value wherein the fluid pressure in the groove exceeds the seal lip opening pressure and the lubricant then escapes into the lubricant side of the seal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid pressure buildup: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS8925927B2Seal with controllable pump rate
Publication Date: 2015.01.06 FREUDENBERG NOK GEN PARTNERSHIP
  • US8925927B2 patent drawing
  • US8925927B2 patent drawing
  • US8925927B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A dynamic seal advantageously utilizes a groove on the active side or surface of the seal to capture a leaked lubricant and hydrodynamically pump the lubricant back into the lubricated side of the seal. The groove stops short of the leading edge of the seal that faces the lubricant side thereby forming a static dam between the termination point of the groove and the seal edge. When the fluid pressure within the groove adjacent the static dam exceeds the opening pressure for the seal lip, the lubricant within the groove is pumped back into the lubricant side of the seal. The groove can have an induction zone wherein the fluid pressure rise is gradual and a booster zone wherein the fluid pressure rise is relatively faster than in the induction zone. The booster zone is disposed adjacent the static dam.