Shaft Slip-Off Stopping Structure With Elastic Locking Pieces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional shaft slip-off stopping structures suffer from insufficient strength, ease of slipping off due to bifurcation or division of components, and increased component complexity, which complicates manufacturing and increases costs.

Innovation Solution

A shaft slip-off stopping structure featuring a locking mechanism with annular grooves and ring-shaped projections, supported by elastic locking pieces arranged around the shaft, which engage the shaft tip to prevent slipping, allowing for minimal components and robust assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the shaft is bifurcated to allow passage through a hole, then the shaft can be inserted and elastically returned, but the overall shaft strength becomes insufficient and it may easily slip off

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsertion and elastic return capabilityVSAvoidshaft strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The shaft tip is segmented into multiple locking pieces arranged around the shaft at equal intervals. Each locking piece includes a base part extending along the shaft length direction and a tip locking portion bending from the base part. This segmentation allows the shaft to be inserted elastically while maintaining overall strength through the distributed locking structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking pieces are nested within the shaft structure, with the tip locking portions abutting on the locking step portion formed by the annular groove or ring-shaped projection. This nesting allows the locking mechanism to be integrated into the shaft without adding external components, maintaining strength while enabling elastic return.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If a clip projects in the transverse direction to stop the shaft, then the shaft can be prevented from slipping off, but the number of components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshaft slip-off preventionVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking function is merged into the shaft structure itself through the locking pieces that are part of the shaft inserted member. The tip locking portions of these pieces directly abut on the locking step portion to prevent slip-off, eliminating the need for separate external clips or stopping members.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking pieces serve multiple functions: they provide the locking action to prevent slip-off, maintain elastic return capability during insertion, and are integrated into the shaft structure. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional specialized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Strength

If the locking mechanism uses multiple locking pieces arranged around the shaft, then the shaft strength is sufficient and slip-off is prevented, but the structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshaft strengthVSAvoidlocking mechanism structure
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking pieces are arranged asymmetrically around the shaft at equal intervals, with each piece having a specific orientation where the tip locking portion abuts on the locking step portion. This asymmetric arrangement provides sufficient strength through distributed locking while maintaining a relatively simple structure compared to symmetric multi-component systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using external clips projecting from the shaft, the locking pieces are integrated into the shaft structure with their tip locking portions bending from the base part. This inverted approach simplifies the overall structure while maintaining the necessary locking function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a robust, low-component-count shaft slip-off stopping structure that is difficult to pull out, ensuring sufficient strength and reducing manufacturing complexity and costs by eliminating the need for additional stopping members like E-rings.

Implementation Method 1

Each of the extension parts, being pushed against the abutting end part, is deformed to allow for passage of the abutting end part, and is elastically returned after the passage so as to be engaged when the abutting end part is pulled up.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9239587B2Shaft slip-off stopping structure and switch having the same
Publication Date: 2016.01.19 TOYO DENSO CO LTD
  • US9239587B2 patent drawing
  • US9239587B2 patent drawing
  • US9239587B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a shaft inserted member into which a shaft is inserted in a relatively movable manner, and a locking mechanism provided in the shaft inserted member. The tip portion of the shaft includes a locking step portion formed by providing an annular groove or a ring-shaped projection portion. The locking mechanism includes at least two locking pieces arranged around the shaft at an equal interval. The shaft is stopped from slipping off by a tip portion of each of the tip locking portions abutting on the locking step portion. The locking piece can receive the force in a pulling direction in a length direction of the locking piece, whereby a load can be reduced. That is, sufficient strength can be maintained.