Shallow Pavilion Diamond Cut for Higher Yield Without Fish Eye

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing round and fancy cut diamonds suffer from high weight loss during cutting and polishing due to tall crown heights and steep pavilion angles, making 'flat stones' unmarketable and increasing production costs, while traditional cuts compromise on optical quality to avoid the 'fish eye' effect.

Innovation Solution

Shallow pavilion angle cuts with specific crown and pavilion angles, combined with a pointed culet, enhance light reflection and reduce weight loss, allowing 'flat stones' to be efficiently cut into high-quality diamonds with improved sparkle and light amplification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional steep pavilion angles and tall crown heights are used to avoid the 'fish eye' effect, then optical quality is improved, but weight loss during cutting and polishing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical qualityVSAvoidweight loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the pavilion angle from the traditional steep angle (greater than 40 degrees) to a shallower angle (30-38 degrees), and adjusting the crown height ratio from 13-16% to 16-18%. These parameter changes resolve the contradiction by achieving equivalent or superior optical quality without the traditional weight loss, as the shallower pavilion angle reduces material removal while the increased crown height ratio maintains light reflection properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the traditional approach by using a shallower pavilion angle instead of a steeper one. Conventionally, steep pavilion angles were believed necessary to prevent the 'fish eye' effect, but this patent reverses that assumption by demonstrating that shallower angles (30-38 degrees) combined with increased crown height ratios can achieve the same optical quality with reduced weight loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Productivity

If shallow pavilion angle cuts are used to reduce weight loss, then cut weight yield is improved, but optical characteristics may deteriorate due to the 'fish eye' effect

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecut weight yieldVSAvoidoptical characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes to resolve this contradiction by precisely controlling the pavilion angle within 30-38 degrees and the crown height ratio within 16-18%. These specific parameter ranges optimize both cut weight yield and optical characteristics, preventing the 'fish eye' effect while maximizing material utilization. The pointed culet geometry further refines light reflection to maintain optical quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by optimizing specific regions of the diamond: the crown portion is enhanced with a increased height ratio (16-18%) to improve light reflection, while the pavilion portion uses a shallower angle (30-38 degrees) to reduce weight loss. The pointed culet at the bottom provides localized light focusing that prevents the 'fish eye' effect, allowing each region to contribute optimally to both yield and optical quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If traditional round brilliant cut parameters are used, then optical quality is maintained, but girdle diameter to stone weight ratio is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical qualityVSAvoidgirdle diameter to stone weight ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by increasing the crown height ratio from 13-16% to 16-18% and adjusting the pavilion angle to 30-38 degrees. These changes create a shallower overall stone profile that increases the girdle diameter relative to the stone weight, giving the visual appearance of a larger stone while maintaining optical quality through the optimized crown and pavilion geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The shallow pavilion angle cuts achieve equivalent or superior optical characteristics to traditional cuts with reduced weight loss, providing a larger visual impression and higher yield, thus reducing production costs and enhancing diamond quality.

Implementation Method 1

A pavilion surface extends at a pavilion angle relative to the table... enhance light reflection and reduce weight loss

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS12520916B2Shallow depth cut diamonds
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 TOMASIK LESZEK
  • US12520916B2 patent drawing
  • US12520916B2 patent drawing
  • US12520916B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention is directed to shallow pavilion, cut diamonds having excellent optical characteristics. The pavilion surface includes a plurality of substantially planar main pavilion facets, each of which extend from the girdle to a pointed culet defining the bottom most portion of the cut diamond. The crown angle is in the range of between about 29 degrees to about 36 degrees, and the pavilion angle is in the range of between about 15 degrees and about 34.5 degrees. The shallow pavilion, cut diamonds of the invention may be either round shaped cut diamonds or fancy shaped cut diamonds.