Shallow Pole Holder Structure for Secure Low-Material Support
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing support systems for poles, such as in camping and electric vehicle applications, often require deep holders that consume more materials, increase manufacturing costs, and weight, while lacking sufficient structural integrity under environmental conditions.
Innovation Solution
A shallow holder design with grooves and protrusions that securely engage a pole end, providing sturdy support through friction, reducing material usage and weight, and maintaining stability in various conditions.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Strength
If a deep holder design is used to support poles, then structural integrity is improved, but material consumption increases and weight increases
Solution Approach 1:
The holder is divided into multiple functional sections: an upper engagement portion with grooves for pole retention, a middle reinforcement section, and a lower base portion. This segmentation allows each part to perform its specific function efficiently without requiring excessive material throughout the entire structure, resolving the contradiction between structural integrity and material consumption.
Solution Approach 2:
The holder employs composite construction techniques, combining different materials or material densities in different sections. The upper engagement portion uses high-strength materials for pole retention, while the base portion may use lighter materials, achieving optimal structural integrity with reduced overall material consumption.
2Strength
If a deep holder design is used to support poles, then structural integrity is improved, but weight increases
Solution Approach 1:
By segmenting the holder into functional zones with varying material distribution and thickness, the design concentrates material where structurally necessary (upper engagement portion) and reduces it where less critical (base portion), maintaining strength while minimizing weight.
Solution Approach 2:
Different sections of the holder have different structural properties tailored to their specific functions. The upper portion has higher density and strength for pole engagement, while lower sections have reduced material content, achieving optimal strength-to-weight ratio throughout the structure.
3Ease of manufacture
If a shallow holder design is used to reduce material consumption, then manufacturing costs are reduced, but structural integrity may be compromised
Solution Approach 1:
The shallow holder is segmented into compact functional sections that maximize structural efficiency within a reduced overall depth. The engagement grooves, reinforcement ribs, and base structure are tightly integrated, providing adequate structural integrity for pole support while minimizing material usage and manufacturing cost.
4Loss of substance
If a shallow holder design is used to reduce material consumption, then weight is reduced, but structural integrity may be compromised
Solution Approach 1:
The holder structure is segmented into efficient load-bearing sections that provide maximum structural integrity for the minimum material depth required. The engagement portion, reinforcement zones, and base are optimized to work together, achieving adequate strength with reduced material consumption.
Solution Approach 2:
The use of composite materials or optimized material distribution in the shallow holder allows high-strength performance in critical areas while minimizing overall material usage, resolving the contradiction between structural integrity and material consumption.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The shallow holder design efficiently supports poles without wavering or bending, reducing material consumption and manufacturing costs while ensuring reliable structural integrity.
Implementation Method 1
The pole end can include a ball or other protrusion that, when pushed into the holder, can engage with the groove in the holder and lock the pole in the holder by friction.
Data Source
AI summary
A pole insertion mechanism is provided. The pole end can include a bottom portion opposite a top portion of the pole end. A holder can receive the pole end. The holder can include a first opening located on a top portion of the holder. The holder can include a second opening located on a side portion of the holder. The second opening can be located below the first opening and configured to engage the pole end in the holder. The holder can include a third opening, located on a bottom portion of the holder. The third opening can be located below the first opening and the second opening. The third opening can be configured to receive the bottom portion of the pole end.