Shape Recovery from Differential Motion with Unknown Reflectance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shape determination methods from optical flow rely on incorrect assumptions such as brightness constancy and diffuse reflection, failing to accurately account for real-world objects' reflectance behavior, particularly under unknown bidirectional reflectance distribution functions (BRDF).

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that determines shape from differential motion by relating image intensities to arbitrary BRDF, using various camera and illumination conditions, including orthographic and perspective projections, colocated lighting, area lighting, and RGB+Depth sensors, to eliminate BRDF terms and recover depth and surface normal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If brightness constancy assumption is used, then shape determination is simplified, but accuracy deteriorates due to incorrect physical model

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape determination method complexityVSAvoidshape reconstruction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of reflectance modeling from simplified assumptions (brightness constancy or diffuse reflection) to the general BRDF function. This allows the system to accurately model real-world reflectance behavior while maintaining computational feasibility through differential motion analysis that eliminates BRDF terms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If diffuse reflection model is used, then computation is simplified, but accuracy deteriorates for most real-world objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational complexityVSAvoidshape reconstruction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the BRDF terms from the imaging equations through differential motion analysis. By taking the time derivative of the imaging equation and eliminating BRDF dependencies, the system obtains a simplified relation between image intensities, motion, and shape that is accurate for general reflectance models without requiring complex computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If unknown BRDF is modeled, then reflectance accuracy is improved, but problem complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereflectance modeling accuracyVSAvoidshape determination problem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses differential motion (time derivatives) to transform the static imaging problem into a dynamic one. By analyzing changes in image intensity over time during object motion, the system can eliminate BRDF terms and recover shape information that would otherwise be inaccessible with static images and unknown reflectance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8879851B2Shape from differential motion with unknown reflectance
Publication Date: 2014.11.04 NEC CORP
  • US8879851B2 patent drawing
  • US8879851B2 patent drawing
  • US8879851B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer implemented method for determining shape from differential motion with unknown reflectance includes deriving a general relation that relates spatial and temporal image derivatives to bidirectional reflectance distribution function BRDF derivatives, responsive to 3D points and relative camera poses from images and feature tracks of an object in motion under colocated and unknown directional light conditions, employing a rank deficiency in image sequences from the deriving for shape determinations, under predetermined multiple camera and lighting conditions, to eliminate BDRF terms; and recovering a surface depth for determining a shape of the object.