Shaped Ion Beam Alignment Using Reference Aperture Calibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing focused ion beam systems face challenges in accurately aligning and optimizing shaped beams, particularly elliptical beams, which are difficult to calibrate due to complex beam profiles and unpredictable stigmator voltage and focus value settings, leading to poor beam quality and sample damage.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that optimizes shaped beams by determining a reference stigmator voltage through a reference beam-defining aperture and adjusting the focus value of an objective lens to align and focus a shaped working beam, using a unique combination of stigmator voltage and focus value to minimize beam dimensions and improve alignment accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a high beam current is used for quick material removal, then productivity increases, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to beam unfocusing and sample damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemilling rateVSAvoidbeam focusing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the beam calibration process into two distinct phases: round beam calibration followed by shaped beam optimization. This segmentation allows the system to first establish a stable reference point with a round beam, then build upon that foundation to optimize shaped beams for high current operation, thereby maintaining precision at higher productivities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary calibration using a round beam aperture before optimizing the shaped beam parameters. This preliminary action establishes a known good reference state that the subsequent shaped beam optimization can build upon, ensuring that even at high currents, the beam maintains proper focus and alignment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If a low beam current is used for precise processing, then manufacturing precision improves, but productivity decreases due to longer processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam focusing accuracyVSAvoidmaterial removal rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operational parameters by introducing a two-stage calibration approach that enables shaped beams to operate at higher currents while maintaining precision. The key parameter change is the optimization of stigmator voltages and lens currents specifically for shaped beams, allowing them to achieve both high current and tight focusing simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If traditional calibration methods are used for shaped beams, then device complexity remains simple, but measurement precision deteriorates due to unpredictable stigmator voltage and focus value settings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration procedureVSAvoidbeam alignment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system measures the actual beam characteristics after round beam calibration and uses this information to guide the shaped beam optimization. The iterative adjustment of stigmator voltages and focus values based on measured beam performance provides the feedback loop needed to achieve precise alignment without overly complicating the overall device

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If shaped beam apertures are used to increase beam current, then productivity improves, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to poor beam quality and alignment errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemilling speedVSAvoidbeam positioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary optimization of the shaped beam parameters including stigmator voltages and lens currents before actual milling operations. This preliminary action ensures that the shaped beam is properly aligned and focused, eliminating alignment errors and positioning inaccuracies that would otherwise occur when using shaped beam apertures for high current operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method enhances beam alignment and focus optimization, enabling high-current, precise milling operations with reduced processing time and minimal sample damage, improving the efficiency and accuracy of charged particle beam systems.

Implementation Method 1

The lenses and other 'optical' elements (e.g., a stigmator) in the beam column may use electrostatic or magnetic fields to align the beam along the optical axis and focus the beam on the target plane.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

The lenses and other 'optical' elements (e.g., a stigmator) in the beam column may use electrostatic or magnetic fields to align the beam along the optical axis and focus the beam on the target plane.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS20260018377A1Optimization and alignment of shaped charged particle beams
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 FEI CO
  • US20260018377A1 patent drawing
  • US20260018377A1 patent drawing
  • US20260018377A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A focused ion beam system includes an ion source, an aperture plate having a reference aperture and a shaped aperture, a stigmator, an objective lens, and a controller. The controller directs the ion source to emit ions to form an ion beam; determines, while the ion beam passes through the reference aperture to form a reference beam, a reference stigmator voltage to minimize a dimension of the reference beam; and determines, while the ion beam passes through the shaped aperture to form a shaped working beam and while operating the stigmator using the reference stigmator voltage, a focus value of the objective lens to optimize a size of the shaped working beam. A shape of the shaped working beam is different from a shape of the reference beam and has a first dimension corresponding to the dimension of the reference beam and a second dimension larger than the first dimension.