Shared Accumulator for Plasma Gas Pressure Stabilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The single-line-drop approach in cluster tools, where multiple mass flow controllers (MFCs) share a single regulator, often results in processing performance issues such as etch profile and uniformity problems due to pressure fluctuations, affecting yield.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a shared accumulator between the MFCs and the shared regulator to absorb pressure spikes and dips, increasing the combined manifold and accumulator volume, thereby reducing MFC cross-talk and stabilizing input pressure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If multiple MFCs share a single regulator via a shared manifold, then cost and spatial efficiency are improved, but processing performance deteriorates due to pressure fluctuations affecting etch profile and uniformity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of regulatorsVSAvoidetch profile uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the gas supply path by introducing a shared accumulator between the shared regulator and the multiple MFCs. This segmentation isolates the MFCs from direct pressure fluctuations originating at the regulator, allowing the regulator to serve multiple MFCs without compromising individual MFC performance. The accumulator acts as a buffer zone that decouples the regulatory function from the distribution function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The shared accumulator serves as an intermediary component between the shared regulator and the multiple MFCs. It mediates the pressure transmission by absorbing spikes and dips, preventing direct pressure variations from the regulator from affecting the MFCs. This intermediary buffer enables cost-effective shared regulation while maintaining the precision required for accurate mass flow control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Area of stationary object

If multiple MFCs share a single regulator, then spatial efficiency is improved by reducing regulators near chambers, but pressure stability deteriorates causing MFC cross-talk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace near chamberVSAvoidinput pressure stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The solution relocates the regulator from the traditional location near the chamber to a remote location, utilizing another dimension of space. The shared accumulator is positioned near the chamber to provide local pressure buffering, while the regulator operates remotely. This spatial reconfiguration reduces clutter near the chamber while maintaining pressure stability through the accumulator's buffering action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The shared accumulator acts as an intermediary that bridges the remote regulator and the nearby MFCs. It receives regulated gas from the remote regulator and provides stable pressure to the MFCs locally, eliminating the need for the regulator to be positioned near the chamber while maintaining pressure stability and preventing MFC cross-talk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Area of stationary object

If regulator is positioned remotely from MFCs, then spatial efficiency is improved, but pressure control precision deteriorates without accumulation buffer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilizationVSAvoidpressure control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The shared accumulator serves as a critical intermediary between the remote regulator and the MFCs. It compensates for the distance by providing local pressure buffering, ensuring that pressure control precision is maintained despite the regulator's remote position. The accumulator's volume is specifically designed to absorb pressure variations that would otherwise propagate from the remote regulator to the MFCs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the pressure control function from the gas distribution function. The remote regulator handles gas distribution to multiple lines, while the shared accumulator near the MFCs handles pressure stabilization. This segmentation allows the regulator to be remotely positioned for space efficiency while the accumulator ensures precise pressure control where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances processing performance by minimizing pressure fluctuations, improving etch profile and uniformity, and maintaining yield, while maintaining spatial efficiency and reducing costs.

Implementation Method 1

Incorporating a shared accumulator between the MFCs and the shared regulator to absorb pressure spikes and dips

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure fluctuation absorption: Accumulator (energy)

Data Source

PatentUS10002747B2Methods and apparatus for supplying process gas in a plasma processing system
Publication Date: 2018.06.19 LAM RES CORP
  • US10002747B2 patent drawing
  • US10002747B2 patent drawing
  • US10002747B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for supplying gas in a plasma processing system that employs the single line drop approach wherein a regulator is shared among multiple mass flow controllers. In one or more embodiments, an accumulator is provided and coupled in gaseous communication with a shared manifold to reduce pressure spikes and dips. A filter, which may be replaceable or non-replaceable separate from the accumulator, is integrated with the accumulator in one or more embodiments.