Shared-Channel DCI Piggybacking for Lower UE Decoding Load

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In high-frequency wireless communications systems, increased search space monitoring and blind decoding of downlink control information (DCI) result in excessive computational complexity and power consumption for user equipment (UEs).

Innovation Solution

Implementing 'piggyback' DCI, where downlink data transmissions are multiplexed with additional DCI, allowing for dynamic switching between low density parity check (LDPC) and polar encoding schemes based on payload size thresholds to optimize coding gain and complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional separate DCI transmission is used, then control information is transmitted reliably, but computational complexity and power consumption at UEs increase excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDCI transmission reliabilityVSAvoidUE computational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines DCI components with downlink shared data into a single multiplexed transmission on the downlink shared channel. This merging eliminates the need for separate DCI transmission and reduces the number of blind decoding operations UEs must perform, thereby reducing computational complexity while maintaining reliable control information delivery through the integrated channel structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The downlink shared channel is designed to serve dual purposes: transmitting both downlink shared data and DCI components simultaneously. This multi-functionality allows the same physical channel to carry both control and user plane information, reducing overall system complexity and UE processing burden while maintaining the reliability of control information transmission

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If LDPC encoding is used for large payload sizes, then coding gain is optimized, but if polar encoding is used for small payload sizes, then complexity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoding gainVSAvoidencoding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic encoding scheme selection based on the aggregated payload size of DCI components. When the payload exceeds a threshold, LDPC encoding is applied for superior coding gain; when below the threshold, polar encoding is used for lower complexity. This dynamic adaptation optimizes the trade-off between reliability and complexity for different payload conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the encoding parameter (encoding scheme type) based on the payload size parameter. By monitoring the aggregated DCI component size and adjusting the encoding approach accordingly, the system adapts to different transmission conditions, selecting the most appropriate encoding method to balance performance and complexity requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260025833A1Shared channel piggybacking
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20260025833A1 patent drawing
  • US20260025833A1 patent drawing
  • US20260025833A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communication are described. A network entity may switch between low density parity check (LDPC) and polar encoding schemes depending on the payload size of the DCI components and how the DCI components are bundled (i.e., jointly or separately). The switching between LDPC and polar encoding schemes may be based on a payload size threshold. This threshold may be hard coded or it may be semi-statically configured using radio resource control (RRC) signaling.