Shared-Coil Inverter Control for Dual-Zone Induction Heating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increase in the number of switching elements in induction heating apparatuses with full-bridge inverter circuits leads to higher circuit design complexity and manufacturing costs.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a configuration where two working coils share switching elements, using a half-bridge or full-bridge mode based on power requirements, reducing the number of required switching elements and optimizing circuit design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If full-bridge inverter circuits are used for each working coil, then heating performance is improved, but the number of switching elements increases leading to higher circuit design complexity and manufacturing costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating performanceVSAvoidcircuit design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the inverter circuits for the first and second working coils by sharing common switching elements (Q1-Q4) and DC link components (C1, L1). This consolidation allows both coils to be driven while reducing the total number of switching elements from eight to six, thereby decreasing circuit design complexity and manufacturing costs while maintaining full-bridge heating capability for both zones

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The shared switching elements and DC link components serve multiple functions by being common to both working coils. The same switching elements can drive either the first working coil, the second working coil, or both simultaneously in different configurations, providing universal functionality that reduces overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Power

If full-bridge inverter circuits are used for each working coil, then heating performance is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the inverter circuits for the first and second working coils by sharing common switching elements (Q1-Q4) and DC link components (C1, L1). This consolidation allows both coils to be driven while reducing the total number of switching elements from eight to six, thereby decreasing circuit design complexity and manufacturing costs while maintaining full-bridge heating capability for both zones

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a control strategy that dynamically switches between full-bridge mode and half-bridge mode based on heating requirements. When only one working coil needs to operate at high power, the system uses full-bridge mode for that coil. When both coils need operation, it coordinates them appropriately. This selective operation reduces unnecessary use of switching elements, thereby reducing manufacturing cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces circuit complexity and manufacturing costs while maintaining efficient heating performance by dynamically adjusting the switching mode to match power demands.

Implementation Method 1

an induction magnetic field may be generated around the working coil disposed in the induction heating apparatus. When a magnetic force line of the induced magnetic field generated in this way passes through the bottom of the container having a metal component placed on the working coil, an eddy current may be generated inside the bottom of the container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

an eddy current may be generated inside the bottom of the container. When the eddy current generated in this way flows through the container, the container itself may be heated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy current: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 3

When the eddy current generated in this way flows through the container, the container itself may be heated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS12575008B2Induction heating apparatus and method for controlling induction heating apparatus
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US12575008B2 patent drawing
  • US12575008B2 patent drawing
  • US12575008B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An induction heating apparatus may include a first working coil provided in a position corresponding to a first heating region, a second working coil provided in a position corresponding to a second heating region, an inverter circuit configured to supply current for driving at least one of the first working coil or the second working coil, and a drive circuit configured to supply a switching signal to each of the switching elements. A controller may be configured to determine a driving mode of the working coil when a heating start command for at least one of the first working coil or the second working coil is input, and the controller may provide a control signal for outputting the switching signals based on the determined driving mode.