Shared Guide Rail Layout for Stable Elevator and Counterweight Guidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing elevator systems face a conflict between achieving robust guidance of the elevator car and counterweight while minimizing the number and cost of guide rails, which are space-intensive and costly.

Innovation Solution

An elevator system with three guide rails arranged on different sides of a hoistway, including two double guide rails for both the elevator car and counterweight, and a single guide rail for additional support, allowing for stable guidance with reduced material and installation costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the number of guide rails is reduced to lower material and installation costs, then cost is reduced, but the robustness and stability of guidance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial and installation costVSAvoidguidance stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the guidance functions for the elevator car and counterweight into shared guide rails. Specifically, guide rails 4a and 4b serve dual purposes by guiding both the elevator car (via guiding devices 24) and the counterweight (via guiding devices 24), thereby reducing the total number of guide rails needed while maintaining adequate guidance stability for both components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The guide rails are designed with multi-functionality to perform multiple guidance tasks simultaneously. The same guide rail structure provides guidance support for both the elevator car and counterweight, making the guide rail system universal and reducing redundancy in the guidance infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If more guide rails are installed to improve guidance robustness, then guidance stability is improved, but the hoistway space available for the elevator car is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguidance stabilityVSAvoidelevator car space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By merging the guidance functions for the elevator car and counterweight into the same guide rails, the patent eliminates the need for separate dedicated guide rails for each component. This consolidation frees up hoistway space that would otherwise be occupied by additional guide rails, allowing for a larger elevator car volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and eliminates redundant guide rails from the system by identifying that separate guide rails for the counterweight are not necessary. The counterweight guidance is integrated into the existing guide rails used for the elevator car, removing unnecessary structural elements and optimizing space utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20260048962A1Elevator system having three combined guiding points for elevator car and counterweight
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 OTIS ELEVATOR CO
  • US20260048962A1 patent drawing
  • US20260048962A1 patent drawing
  • US20260048962A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An elevator system (1) for transporting goods and/or passengers. The elevator system (1) includes an elevator car (2), a counterweight (3) being motion coupled with the elevator car (2), and several guide rails (4a, 4b, 4c). The guide rails (4a, 4b, 4c) run parallel to each other and guide the elevator car (2) and the counterweight (3) during their up and down movement. In total three guide rails (4a, 4b, 4c) are provided which are distanced from each other and at least one of these guide rails (4a, 4b, 4c) has a first guiding portion (6) receiving the elevator car (2) and a second guiding portion (7) receiving the counterweight (3).