Shared-Inductor Amplifier for Low-EMI Efficient Power Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power amplifiers face challenges in achieving high efficiency like Class D amplifiers while minimizing costs and electromagnetic interference (EMI) issues, and in effectively utilizing single inductor multiple output (SIMO) regulators for amplification purposes.

Innovation Solution

The development of a resource pooling amplifier that shares at least one inductor among multiple load terminals or uses it for multiple purposes, such as switching, time-sharing, or monitoring load requirements to optimize usage and reduce EMI, allowing for efficient power transfer beyond the supply voltage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If Class D amplifiers are used to achieve high efficiency, then power dissipation is reduced, but additional output inductors are required and EMI problems occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower dissipationVSAvoidoutput inductors
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the output inductor serve multiple functions: it acts as both the power transfer inductor for Class D operation and as the output filter inductor for Class AB operation. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate inductors for different operating modes, reducing component count while maintaining high efficiency benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the Class D power transfer function and Class AB output filtering function into a single inductor component. By combining these functions, the system achieves high efficiency power transfer without requiring additional output inductors, thus reducing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of manufacture

If Class AB amplifiers are used to achieve high linearity, then cost structure is simplified, but power dissipation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost structureVSAvoidpower dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic switching between Class AB and Class D operating modes based on signal conditions. The system operates in Class AB mode for low-power applications to maintain simplicity and linearity, then switches to Class D mode for high-power applications to reduce power dissipation, optimizing both cost structure and energy efficiency dynamically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If multiple inductors are used for multiple load terminals, then each load receives dedicated power transfer, but cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower transferVSAvoidinductor quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes a single inductor serve multiple load terminals by implementing time-sharing and switching mechanisms. The inductor is allocated to different loads based on which load requires power transfer at any given moment, allowing one inductor to replace multiple dedicated inductors while maintaining reliable power transfer to each load when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If inductor sharing is implemented among multiple loads, then cost and component count are reduced, but EMI problems may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinductor quantityVSAvoidEMI
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic switching and time-sharing of the shared inductor among multiple loads. By alternating the connection of different loads to the shared inductor in a controlled periodic manner, the system reduces simultaneous switching conflicts and electromagnetic interference while maintaining the cost benefits of inductor sharing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances efficiency and reduces costs by allowing the amplifier to operate effectively with reduced EMI, achieving high efficiency and flexibility in power transfer, including exceeding the rail voltage without the need for additional inductors.

Implementation Method 1

a first inductor having a first terminal and a second terminal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a first switching circuitry operationally coupled to control opening and closing of a first set of switches directing current through the first inductor and the first load terminal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUSRE47383E1Resource pooling amplifier
Publication Date: 2019.05.07 MAXIM INTEGRATED PROD INC
  • USRE47383E1 patent drawing
  • USRE47383E1 patent drawing
  • USRE47383E1 patent drawing

AI summary

A new type of amplifier, herein designated a resource pooling amplifier, involves extended usage of one or more inductors that is implemented by sharing. The sharing is either by switching the inductor or inductors among more than one load terminal at the same time (e.g., a bridged configuration or two different loads terminals with different polarity requirements) or by using the inductor or inductors for more than one purpose at different times. The inductor or inductors may be time shared such as by allocating different phases of a clock. The inductor or inductors may also be shared by monitoring load requirements and using the inductor or inductors only when needed (leaving other inductor cycles for other loads). In addition, inductor sharing may be implemented during different application requirements such as if two or more loads are not needed at the same time in a system. These types of sharing may be combined.