Shared Regenerator Partition for Fluid Catalytic Cracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) processes face challenges with catalyst deactivation due to varying coke content in spent catalysts from multiple reactors, leading to inefficient regeneration and increased operational costs with separate regenerators for each reactor.

Innovation Solution

A regenerator assembly with a partition divides the vessel into subunits to regenerate spent catalysts from multiple reactors to different degrees, using controlled air flow to manage coke combustion and prevent unwanted deactivation, shared by multiple reactors to reduce costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate regenerators are used for each reactor, then each catalyst can be regenerated independently, but device complexity and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst regeneration efficiencyVSAvoidregenerator configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shared regenerator is divided into multiple compartments or zones that can independently receive and process spent catalyst from different reactors. Each compartment can be optimized for specific catalyst types or coke levels while maintaining overall system integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A single regenerator unit is designed to handle spent catalyst from multiple reactors with varying coke content, making the system multi-functional. The regenerator can process different catalyst loads and types through controlled air flow and residence time management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If spent catalyst with varying coke content is regenerated together, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision of regeneration control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregenerator configurationVSAvoidregeneration control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Different zones within the shared regenerator are designed with distinct characteristics (temperature, air flow rate, residence time) to match the specific regeneration needs of catalyst from different reactors. High coke content catalyst receives intensive treatment in one zone while low coke catalyst is processed in another.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts air flow rates, temperature profiles, and residence times based on the coke content and operational status of different reactors. This dynamic control enables precise regeneration management despite varying catalyst conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If longer residence time is used in regenerator, then coke combustion is more complete, but thermal deactivation of catalyst increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoke combustion completenessVSAvoidcatalyst residence time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes the balance between residence time and temperature by adjusting operational parameters dynamically. Different catalyst batches experience different residence time-temperature profiles to achieve complete coke combustion without excessive thermal deactivation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The regenerator operates with periodic air supply cycles that alternate between high air flow (for complete combustion) and reduced air flow (to prevent overheating). This periodic action allows complete coke removal while controlling thermal stress on the catalyst.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively regenerates spent catalysts to desired levels, reducing catalyst deactivation and operational costs while maintaining product yield and quality, by allowing separate regeneration of catalysts with varying coke content.

Implementation Method 1

The regeneration of the spent catalyst generates sufficient heat and increases the temperature of the catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

a hydrocarbon feedstock of a high boiling point range is pre-heated and then brought into contact with a hot cracking catalyst in a catalytic cracking reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalytic cracking: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

The hot catalyst that is thus regenerated is directed back to the catalytic cracking reactor for the cracking process and is utilized to carry out the endothermic catalytic cracking

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEndothermic reaction: Endothermic Reaction

Data Source

PatentUS10344220B2Methods and apparatus for fluid catalytic cracking
Publication Date: 2019.07.09 HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORP LTD
  • US10344220B2 patent drawing
  • US10344220B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) of a hydrocarbon feedstock includes a first reactor (1), a second reactor (2), and a regenerator assembly (3) shared and connected with the two reactors. The regenerator assembly (3) includes a regenerator vessel which has a partition (17) dividing the regenerator vessel into a first subunit (18) and a second subunit (19); a plurality of regenerator inlets for receiving a first spent catalyst and second spent catalyst by the first subunit (18) and the second subunit (19); a plurality of regenerator inlet for receiving a first spent catalyst and a second spent catalyst by the first subunit (18) and the second subunit (10) respectively; an air controller (15) to allow for has flow to an air distributor (16) for supply of the gas to the first subunit (18) and the second subunit (19) to combust coke deposited on the first and the second spent catalyst, separately, to a desired degree to generate a fully and a partially regenerated catalyst.