Shared Robot Controller for Fast Switching in Cooperative Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for controlling multiple robots performing operations on the same object in cooperation face challenges in accurately adjusting control timing with the required speed and accuracy, making it difficult to switch between independent and cooperative operation modes effectively.

Innovation Solution

A robot system comprising first-type and second-type robots with corresponding control parts, where the control part for the second-type robot is changed to the first-type control part to enable coordinated operation, allowing for seamless switching between independent and cooperative modes, and efficient operation by sharing degrees of freedom and reducing the number of axes required for each robot.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If control parts are connected by communication cable to enable multi-axis simultaneous control, then robots can perform cooperative operations, but control timing adjustment accuracy and speed deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooperative operation capabilityVSAvoidcontrol timing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple control parts into a single control part that manages multiple robots. This consolidation eliminates communication cable delays between control parts, enabling precise control timing adjustment for cooperative operations while maintaining the ability to switch between independent and cooperative modes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If control parts are connected by communication cable to enable multi-axis simultaneous control, then robots can perform cooperative operations, but control response speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooperative operation capabilityVSAvoidcontrol response speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple control parts into a single control part that manages multiple robots. This consolidation eliminates communication cable delays between control parts, enabling precise control timing adjustment for cooperative operations while maintaining the ability to switch between independent and cooperative modes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If each robot has its own control part, then independent operation is simple, but switching to cooperative mode becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent operation simplicityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs a control part with multi-functionality that can operate in both independent and cooperative modes. The control part includes a generation unit that generates motion commands and a switching mechanism that enables seamless transition between control modes, simplifying the overall system while maintaining operational flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple control parts are used for multiple robots, then each robot can be controlled independently, but the number of control axes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent operation capabilityVSAvoidnumber of control axes
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple control parts into a single control part that manages multiple robots. This consolidation eliminates communication cable delays between control parts, enabling precise control timing adjustment for cooperative operations while maintaining the ability to switch between independent and cooperative modes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control part is designed with multi-functionality to manage both independent and cooperative operations of multiple robots through a unified control architecture, reducing the total number of control axes required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11173612B2Robot system, robot controller, robot control method, and robot program
Publication Date: 2021.11.16 YAMAHA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11173612B2 patent drawing
  • US11173612B2 patent drawing
  • US11173612B2 patent drawing

AI summary

It is possible simply switch between a mode of causing one robot to perform an operation independently from another robot and another mode of causing one robot and another robot to perform an operation in cooperation. A robot system includes a first-type robot, a first-type control part which takes charge of drive control of the first-type robot, a second-type robot, and a second-type control part which takes charge of drive control of the second-type robot. When the first-type robot and the second-type robot perform an operation on the same object in cooperation, a control part in charge of drive control of the second-type robot is changed from the second-type control part to the first-type control part, and the first-type control part takes charge of drive control of the first-type robot and the second-type robot.