Shared Slot Stow and Sortation System for Order Fulfillment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional automated sorting mechanisms in materials handling facilities are limited in velocity, capacity, and flexibility, requiring significant upgrades to accommodate changes in inventory throughput, which is costly and inefficient, and often result in underutilization of capacity and space.

Innovation Solution

A stow and sortation system that allows collections of picked units for multiple orders to be stowed to shared slots, enabling flexible and scalable sorting by using a control system to direct agents in picking and sorting units from shared slots into individual orders, allowing for late binding of units to orders and efficient use of storage space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional automated sorting mechanisms are used, then sorting speed and capacity are improved, but system cost and floor area increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting speed and capacityVSAvoidsystem cost and floor area
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the sorting function into two independent stages: a stow stage where picked items are placed into shared slots, and a sortation stage where items are distributed to individual orders. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently and enables flexible scaling without requiring a complete system replacement, thereby reducing overall system cost and floor area while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic slot assignment where slots can be assigned to multiple orders over time rather than being fixed to single orders. The control system dynamically manages slot allocation based on real-time order requirements, enabling the system to adapt to changing throughput demands without physical reconfiguration, thus reducing the need for expensive system upgrades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If automated sorting mechanisms are increased to meet higher throughput requirements, then sorting capacity is improved, but flexibility and scalability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethroughput capacityVSAvoidflexibility and scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The shared slots serve multiple functions by being assigned to different orders at different times. A single slot can handle items for multiple orders, making the system highly adaptable to varying throughput requirements. This multi-functionality allows the system to scale flexibly by simply adding more slots or adjusting slot assignments through the control system, without requiring proportional increases in automated sorting mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters through software control rather than physical modifications. The control system adjusts slot assignment parameters, pick lists, and sortation schedules to meet changing throughput demands. This parameter-based flexibility allows the system to handle 30-40% increases in order throughput by optimizing existing resources rather than purchasing entirely new sorting mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Extent of automation

If conventional sortation systems are used, then order processing is automated, but storage space utilization is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder processing automationVSAvoidstorage space utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple order storage requirements into shared slots that can accommodate items for different orders. Instead of dedicating separate storage spaces for each order, the system combines storage functions into shared slots that are dynamically allocated. This merging significantly improves storage space utilization while maintaining automated processing through the control system's coordination of pick lists and sortation operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS7941244B2Stow and sortation system
Publication Date: 2011.05.10 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US7941244B2 patent drawing
  • US7941244B2 patent drawing
  • US7941244B2 patent drawing

AI summary

System and method for sortation of picked inventory into individual orders in an order fulfillment process, for example order fulfillment processes in materials handling facilities. Collections of items picked from inventory for multiple orders are stowed to locations at a stow and sortation station. The items for a particular order may be stowed to two or more different locations, and items for two or more orders may be stowed to one location; no particular location is assigned to or reserved for each order. Thus, no space is allocated or reserved for incomplete orders at the station. When all items for a particular order are stowed to locations at the station, the order may be picked from the various locations at the station and placed into order receptacles. The order receptacles may be shipping containers.