Shared SPM Cleaning Module for Post-CMP Chemical and Transfer Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current SPM cleaning processes for semiconductor substrates are inefficient and wasteful, requiring separate tanks for each substrate, leading to high operating costs and chemical usage, and are not compatible with single-substrate processing platforms due to issues with temperature control, cross-contamination, and robotic transfer sequencing.

Innovation Solution

A CMP cleaning system with a sulfuric peroxide mixture (SPM) tank and multiple processing chambers that allow multiple substrates to be processed in the same tank, sharing chemistry, and utilizing a series of tanks for preparation and post-cleaning processes, along with a transport system and robot arms for efficient substrate handling and processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If substrates are processed through SPM cleaning tank in batches with separate tanks for each substrate, then cleaning effectiveness is maintained, but chemical usage increases and operating costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning effectivenessVSAvoidchemical usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple substrate processing operations into a single shared SPM cleaning tank. Instead of using separate tanks for each substrate, the system allows multiple substrates to be processed sequentially in the same tank, thereby reducing chemical usage while maintaining cleaning effectiveness through proper substrate handling and tank design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The SPM cleaning tank is designed to serve multiple substrates universally rather than being dedicated to a single substrate. The tank functions as a shared resource that can process different substrates in sequence, improving resource utilization and reducing overall chemical consumption across the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If substrates are processed through SPM cleaning tank in batches with frequent lid opening, then substrate insertion is enabled, but temperature control deteriorates and cross-contamination risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate insertionVSAvoidtemperature control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-positioning substrates and preparing the cleaning tank before actual processing begins. This includes organizing substrates in advance and configuring the tank to minimize lid openings during the cleaning sequence, thereby maintaining temperature stability while ensuring smooth substrate insertion operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If each substrate is exposed for different times due to robotic transfer sequencing, then flexible processing is achieved, but process control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing flexibilityVSAvoidprocess control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that monitor substrate processing times and robotic transfer sequences in real-time. This feedback enables dynamic adjustment of processing parameters to accommodate varying exposure times while maintaining consistent cleaning quality, thereby managing control complexity through intelligent monitoring and adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances throughput, reduces chemical usage, and maintains chemistry consistency, while integrating SPM processing within a single-substrate platform, minimizing cross-contamination and operational expenses.

Implementation Method 1

a mixture of sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide (e.g., sulfuric peroxide mixture (SPM)) can be used in the removal or dissolution of cerium oxide particulates from the surfaces of a substrate after polishing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

SPM cleaning can be performed in a parallel separated mode in which each substrate is placed in a bath in a separate tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical dissolution: Solvation

Data Source

PatentUS20240412985A1Dedicated sulfuric-peroxide process module for post-CMP cleaning platforms
Publication Date: 2024.12.12 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US20240412985A1 patent drawing
  • US20240412985A1 patent drawing
  • US20240412985A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A substrate cleaning system to remove particulates from multiple substrates includes a cleaning tank for applying a cleaning liquid to substrates, a rinse tank for applying a rinsing liquid to substrates, and a robot system. The cleaning tank includes a stationary lid, an input lid, and an output lid. The input and output lids allow a substrate carrier designed to carry an individual substrate to access an inner volume of the cleaning tank for processing. A transport system moves the substrate in the substrate carrier through the inner volume of the cleaning tank by creating a series of gaps between substrates to allow proper processing. The robot system transports substrates through the input and output lids of the cleaning tank, and transports substrates into the rinse tank.