Shear Bar Infeed Bevel for Forage Harvester Edge Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shear bars in forage harvesters and similar machines are prone to edge breakage due to incorrect setting of the cutting gap, leading to reduced cutting performance and premature replacement, as precise adjustment and maintenance are challenging.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an infeed element with a sintered bevel profiled during the manufacturing process, which is arranged at an angle to the cutting edge, providing a setback and allowing the knife bar to deflect elastically if the cutting gap is not exact, thus preventing hard contact and edge breakage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the cutting gap is set as small as possible to achieve good cutting performance, then cutting performance is improved, but the risk of edge breakage increases due to contact between knife bars and shear bar

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting performanceVSAvoidedge breakage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The infeed bevel is designed as a cushioning element that absorbs excessive closing forces before they reach the cutting edge. When the cutting gap is set too small or shifts during operation, the infeed bevel deforms elastically or allows controlled sliding, preventing hard contact between the knife bar and shear bar, thus protecting the brittle cutting elements from breakage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The infeed bevel changes its geometric parameters under load - it deforms elastically or allows controlled sliding when excessive closing forces occur. This parameter change absorbs the excess force and prevents transmission to the cutting edge, resolving the contradiction between maintaining small cutting gaps for performance and preventing edge breakage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If precise adjustment apparatus and know-how are used to set the cutting gap accurately, then cutting performance is maintained, but device complexity and adjustment difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting performanceVSAvoidadjustment apparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The infeed bevel acts as a self-adjusting element that automatically compensates for imprecise gap settings or shifts during operation. Instead of requiring complex adjustment apparatus and expert know-how to maintain precise settings, the infeed bevel self-regulates by deforming or sliding when excessive forces occur, maintaining cutting performance without complex control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The infeed bevel provides preliminary protection against the harmful effects of imprecise adjustment by absorbing excessive closing forces before they can cause edge breakage. This preliminary anti-action eliminates the need for complex adjustment apparatus and expert intervention, as the system self-corrects for setting errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Manufacturing precision

If the infeed bevel is ground after sintering to achieve precise geometry, then manufacturing precision is improved, but production time and costs increase, and heat treatment may impair joining strength

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinfeed bevel geometry precisionVSAvoidproduction time and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The infeed bevel geometry is prepared in advance during the sintering process itself, eliminating the need for subsequent grinding operations. The sintering process directly produces the required bevel geometry, reducing production time and costs while avoiding heat treatment that could impair joining strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The grinding operation is extracted from the manufacturing process and replaced by direct geometric formation during sintering. This removes the unnecessary intermediate step of grinding, simplifying the manufacturing process while achieving the required precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The infeed element effectively prevents edge breakage by allowing the knife bar to slide on the bevel, maintaining cutting performance even with imprecise gap settings, and simplifies the manufacturing process by eliminating the need for grinding, thereby reducing costs and maintaining strength.

Implementation Method 1

The knife bar slides on the infeed bevel and can be deflected elastically in a radial direction. This is possible, for example, because of the inherent elasticity of the knife bar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

an infeed element, which is embodied as a sintered part made of hard material having an infeed bevel profiled on in the sintering process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS11576303B2Shear bar
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 BETEK
  • US11576303B2 patent drawing
  • US11576303B2 patent drawing
  • US11576303B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a shear bar (20), in particular for a forage harvester or another agricultural or silvicultural machine, having a carrier (21) that comprises a cutting region (30); a plurality of cutting elements (31) being set alongside one another in the cutting region (30); the cutting elements (31) comprising a partial edge and at least some of the partial edges forming a cutting edge (32) that is embodied to form, with a knife bar, a cutting engagement for the material to be shredded; the cutting edge (32) forming a transition between a cutting surface (32.1) that is constituted by the cutting elements (31) and extends transversely to the cutting direction, and an exposed surface (32.2) that extends substantially in a cutting direction and indirectly or directly adjoins the cutting edge (32). A shear bar of this kind can be configured to be break-resistant with little complexity in terms of parts and manufacture if provision is made that an infeed element (34), which is embodied as a sintered part made of hard material having an infeed bevel (34.6) profiled on in the sintering process, is provided on or in the row of cutting elements (31); the infeed bevel (34.6) being carried over indirectly or directly into the cutting edge (32); and the infeed bevel (34.6) being arranged at a tilt with respect to the cutting edge (32) in such a way that it is arranged with a setback with respect to the exposed surface (32.2) and toward the cutting surface (32.1).