Shear-Pin Inertia Igniter for Compact High-G No-Fire Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing inertial igniters for thermal batteries in munitions are too large and not suitable for small reserve batteries, particularly those used in miniaturized fuzing and smart munitions, and require significant differences in no-fire and all-fire acceleration levels to ensure safety and reliability, making them unsuitable for high-G setback accelerations.

Innovation Solution

A compact inertial igniter design with a base, striker mass, and a spring mechanism that allows the striker mass to rotate upon fracture of a shearing or tension element during high-G all-fire acceleration, ensuring safe initiation only under specified conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing inertial igniter design is used, then reliable ignition can be achieved, but the igniter becomes too large for small reserve batteries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition reliabilityVSAvoidigniter volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The igniter is divided into separate functional components: a base element, a striker mass, a spring element, and a shearing pin. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently for its specific function while reducing the overall volume compared to a monolithic design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The striker mass is designed to rotate about an axis perpendicular to the direction of acceleration, utilizing rotational motion in a different dimension to achieve the striking action. This dimensional change allows for a more compact arrangement of components and reduces the overall igniter volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If existing inertial igniter design is used, then ignition can be triggered, but it requires significant differences in no-fire and all-fire acceleration levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacceleration differentiationVSAvoidacceleration level range
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The shearing pin is designed with specific geometric parameters (diameter, length, material properties) that allow it to fail at a well-defined acceleration threshold. By carefully selecting these parameters, the igniter can be tuned to respond to a narrow range of acceleration levels, providing clear differentiation between no-fire and all-fire conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The spring element is pre-loaded to create a mechanical counterforce that must be overcome by the inertial force during acceleration. This substitution of a purely inertial system with a spring-loaded mechanical system allows for more precise control over the acceleration threshold and improves the ability to differentiate between acceleration levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Volume of moving object

If compact igniter design is implemented, then size is reduced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveigniter volumeVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the igniter into distinct components (base element, striker mass, spring element, shearing pin), each part can be manufactured separately using standard processes and then assembled. This reduces the complexity of manufacturing the entire igniter as a single piece while maintaining the compact design benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple functional elements are combined into a single integrated base element that provides both structural support and mounting surfaces for other components. This merging reduces the total number of parts and simplifies assembly while maintaining the compact volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves reliable ignition at high-G accelerations while being significantly smaller and less costly, meeting safety and reliability requirements for munitions with reduced height and volume, and avoiding accidental initiation.

Implementation Method 1

a spring element positioned between the striker mass and the shearing pin, the spring element being pre-loaded in compression

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

a spring element positioned between the striker mass and the shearing pin, the spring element being pre-loaded in compression

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

a shearing pin fixed to the base element and to the striker mass, the shearing pin having a reduced cross-sectional portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFracture Mechanics: Fracture Mechanics

Data Source

PatentUS12523457B2Shear-pin based inertia igniters with preset no-fire protection for munitions and the like
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 OMNITEK PARTNERS LLC
  • US12523457B2 patent drawing
  • US12523457B2 patent drawing
  • US12523457B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inertial igniter including: a base having a first projection; a striker mass rotatably connected to the base, the base having a second projection aligned with the first projection such that the first and second projections impact when rotated; a member having a first portion engaging with a second portion of the striker mass to restrict rotation of the striker mass unless the predetermined acceleration is experienced; a mass movable from a first position where an acceleration is less than the predetermined acceleration and a second position where the acceleration is greater than the predetermined acceleration, the second position permitting the first and second portions to come out of engagement; a spring biasing the movable mass in the first position; and a shear member permitting impact of the first and second projections when the predetermined acceleration is experienced and the movable mass moves to the second position.