Shearing Midsole Structure for Cushioning and Energy Return

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shoe soles, particularly for sports shoes, fail to optimally balance cushioning and energy return, often requiring bulky components that increase joint loads and energy consumption, and do not effectively reduce the risk of injuries during athletic activities.

Innovation Solution

A sole design featuring an upper midsole layer and a lower midsole layer with a shearing structure that allows relative movement between them, utilizing sliding and internal friction to dampen forces and reduce kinetic energy, thereby enhancing cushioning and energy return while minimizing joint loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If bulky cushioning components are used to improve cushioning performance, then cushioning is improved, but device complexity and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecushioning performanceVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The midsole is divided into an upper midsole layer and a lower midsole layer that can move relative to each other. This segmentation allows the cushioning function to be distributed across multiple layers rather than requiring a single bulky component, thereby improving cushioning performance while maintaining structural efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a shearing structure that enables dynamic relative movement between the upper and lower midsole layers. This dynamic capability allows the midsole to adapt to impact forces in real-time, providing effective cushioning without requiring excessive material or complex static structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Use of energy by moving object

If high energy return materials are used to reduce energy consumption, then energy return is improved, but cushioning effectiveness decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy returnVSAvoidcushioning effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The shearing structure enables dynamic interaction between midsole layers that can control energy dissipation. During impact, the layers move relative to each other, creating friction that dissipates energy to protect the foot. During the propulsive phase, the structure can return energy efficiently, thus balancing cushioning effectiveness with energy return.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the mechanical parameters of the midsole system by introducing controlled friction through the shearing structure. This allows the system to exhibit different energy characteristics during different phases of the gait cycle - high energy dissipation during impact and high energy return during propulsion - without requiring different materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If friction-based cushioning is used to reduce joint loads, then cushioning is improved, but energy return decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint load reductionVSAvoidenergy return
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The shearing structure provides dynamic friction control that adapts to the gait cycle. During impact, friction between layers dissipates energy to reduce joint loads. During the propulsive phase, the layers can move more freely to allow energy return, thus balancing protection with performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The shearing structure in the midsole layers improves cushioning and reduces joint impacts, minimizing muscle fatigue and injury risk, particularly during downhill running, by controlling relative movement and generating frictional forces that absorb and dissipate energy.

Implementation Method 1

utilizing sliding and internal friction to dampen forces and reduce kinetic energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a shearing structure, arranged in the midsole; wherein the shearing structure is configured to allow a relative movement between the upper midsole layer and the lower midsole layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear stress: Shear Stress

Data Source

PatentEP4710814A2Midsole with a shearing structure for a shoe and method of manufacturing thereof
Publication Date: 2026.03.18 ADIDAS AG
  • EP4710814A2 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4710814A2 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4710814A2 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a sole (101) for a shoe, in particular for a sports shoe, such as a running shoe, the sole (101) comprising: a midsole (110) comprising an upper midsole layer (120) and a lower midsole layer (125), the upper midsole layer (120) and the lower midsole layer (125) being distinct from one another; and a shearing structure (130), arranged in the midsole (110); wherein the shearing structure (130) is configured to allow a relative movement between the upper midsole layer (120) and the lower midsole layer (125).