Automated Sheathing Layout Optimization for Building Construction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Building construction processes face inefficiencies in determining and optimizing sheathing material usage, leading to excessive waste and labor-intensive on-site cutting due to reliance on manual measurements and simplified calculations.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based method and system that analyzes 3D building frames to identify surfaces, determine the required sheathing material, and generate precise layouts and cut patterns, reducing material waste and optimizing installation by providing pre-cut panels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If manual measurements and simplified calculations are used to determine sheathing material requirements, then the construction process is simpler and easier to execute, but material waste increases and manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of construction processVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary digital modeling and layout calculations before actual construction begins. The software generates optimized sheathing layouts, cut lists, and material requirements in advance, allowing precise material preparation before site installation, thereby minimizing waste while maintaining construction simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual measurement and calculation methods with computer-based automated design and modeling systems. The software automatically calculates optimal sheathing configurations, generates precise cut patterns, and determines material requirements, substituting simplified manual processes with digitally-driven precision while keeping the construction process accessible

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If manual measurements and simplified calculations are used to determine sheathing material requirements, then the construction process is simpler, but manufacturing precision and measurement accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of construction processVSAvoidprecision of sheathing material layout
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual measurement and calculation with automated computer-based design software that performs precise digital measurements, 3D modeling, and layout optimization. This substitution maintains ease of use through user-friendly interfaces while achieving high precision in sheathing material specifications and cut patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The software creates digital copies and virtual models of the building structure and sheathing layouts before physical construction. These digital representations allow precise calculation and visualization of material requirements, enabling high-precision planning while keeping the actual construction process simple and accessible

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If computer-based automated design and modeling is used to determine sheathing material requirements, then manufacturing precision and material optimization improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of sheathing material layoutVSAvoidcomplexity of construction system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The software system performs multiple functions within a single integrated platform: 3D building modeling, surface analysis, sheathing layout optimization, cut pattern generation, and material quantity calculation. This multi-functionality achieves high manufacturing precision while presenting a unified, manageable interface that reduces perceived complexity for users

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The complex design process is segmented into distinct modular steps: inputting building parameters, generating 3D models, selecting sheathing types, optimizing layouts, and producing output documents. This segmentation allows the sophisticated system to be used in manageable stages, reducing the barrier to entry while maintaining high precision capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If computer-based automated design and modeling is used to determine sheathing material requirements, then productivity and material efficiency improve, but loss of time for initial setup increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction efficiencyVSAvoidtime for initial modeling and calculation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs all complex modeling, calculation, and optimization work in advance during the design phase, generating complete construction documentation before site work begins. This preliminary digital preparation eliminates time-consuming on-site measurements and calculations, significantly improving overall construction productivity despite the initial setup time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The software creates comprehensive digital copies of the building structure and sheathing layouts that can be stored, reviewed, and used as exact templates for construction. This digital replication eliminates the need for repeated measurements and recalculations during construction, recovering the initial modeling time through efficient on-site execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20240070334A1Method and system for optimization of the external and internal sheathing for the construction of a building
Publication Date: 2024.02.29 CONSULTING ENGINEERS CORP
  • US20240070334A1 patent drawing
  • US20240070334A1 patent drawing
  • US20240070334A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is a computer method for determining and generating the sheathing materials required for the construction of a building, comprising; receiving, by one or more processors, a model of a structure, analysing, by one or more processors, the model of the structure to identify interior and exterior surfaces, identifying, by one or more processors, a surface type, wherein each surface type has a predetermined set of sheathing material panel types which can be applied to the surface type, receiving, by one or more processors, sheathing material properties via a user interface for each surface layer, wherein the surface layers are limited based on the surface types, receiving, by one or more processors, sheathing material layout parameters via a user interface for each of the surface types, calculating, by one or more processors, a layout of the sheathing material panels for each of the surfaces, and rendering, by one or more processors, an image of the sheathing material layout on each of the surfaces within the user interface.