Sheet Binding Device Automatic Thickness Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Image forming apparatuses face challenges in efficiently binding sheets of varying thickness, as the number of sheets that can be stapled depends on the thickness, requiring complex user settings for staple-free and staple binding processes.

Innovation Solution

A sheet binding device with a processing tray, first and second binding units, thickness detection, and a binding control unit that automatically switches between staple-free and staple binding based on sheet thickness and count, ensuring preferential staple-free binding without user complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If staple-free binding processing is used, then the binding process is simpler and cleaner, but the maximum number of sheets that can be bound is limited by sheet thickness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding process simplicityVSAvoidnumber of sheets that can be bound
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between staple-free and staple binding modes based on real-time detection of sheet thickness and count. The binding control unit adjusts the binding method during operation, transitioning from staple-free (for thinner bundles) to staple-based (for thicker bundles) binding, thereby optimizing both simplicity and sheet capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the binding parameter (staple-free vs. staple-based) according to the detected sheet thickness and number. When the sheet bundle exceeds the thickness limit for staple-free binding, the system switches to staple binding mode, allowing the binding capability to adapt to varying sheet quantities and thicknesses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If the number of sheets is increased beyond staple-free binding capacity, then more sheets can be bound, but the binding process becomes more complex requiring staples

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of sheets that can be boundVSAvoidbinding process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting sheet thickness and count, then autonomously selecting the appropriate binding mode. The thickness detection unit and binding control unit work together to determine whether staple-free or staple binding is appropriate, eliminating the need for user judgment or manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the thickness detection unit to control the binding process. The detection unit continuously monitors sheet thickness and provides feedback to the binding control unit, which adjusts the binding method accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to varying sheet conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If users manually set upper limits for each sheet type, then binding accuracy is improved, but the operation complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesheet thickness measurement accuracyVSAvoiduser setup complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting sheet thickness and count, then autonomously selecting the appropriate binding mode. The thickness detection unit and binding control unit work together to determine whether staple-free or staple binding is appropriate, eliminating the need for user judgment or manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual user operation with automated detection and control mechanisms. The thickness detection unit uses sensors to automatically measure sheet thickness, substituting manual measurement and judgment with automated optical or mechanical detection, thereby improving precision while reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11274012B2Sheet binding device and image forming apparatus
Publication Date: 2022.03.15 KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC
  • US11274012B2 patent drawing
  • US11274012B2 patent drawing
  • US11274012B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sheet binding device includes a first binding unit that performs a first binding process of binding a sheet bundle having a first thickness or less without using a staple, and a second binding unit that performs a second binding process of binding the sheet bundle having a second thickness or less exceeding the first thickness using a staple, the first binding process by the first binding device is preferentially executed when the thickness of the sheet bundle is the first thickness or less, and the second binding process by the second binding unit is executed when the thickness of the sheet bundle exceeds the first thickness and is equal to or less than the second thickness.