Sheet Brake Guide Traverse for Reduced Archway Height

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing arch processing machines with arch brake systems require significant installation space for axial adjustment of brake stations, limiting the use of space for other essential components and increasing the archway height, which affects the stacking quality and efficiency of sheet processing machines like printing presses.

Innovation Solution

A device with a guide traverse having a U-profile design that covers the actuator for axial adjustment of brake stations, reducing the vertical height of the brake station and archway, and incorporating a cleaning system with adjustable nozzles to prevent jamming and ensure play-free operation, while providing secure protection against dirt and pollution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If brake stations are directly assigned positioning drives, then axial adjustment capability is improved, but installation space requirement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial adjustment capabilityVSAvoidinstallation space
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The positioning drives are extracted from the brake station area and relocated to a central position above the arch brake. This separates the adjustment function from the brake station location, enabling axial adjustment without requiring additional installation space at the brake stations themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

A single central positioning drive system serves multiple brake stations simultaneously. The guide traverse with threaded spindles provides universal positioning capability for all brake stations along the arch brake, reducing the total space required compared to individual drives at each station.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If hollow cylinder guide traverse is used, then brake station positioning is improved, but archway height increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake station positioningVSAvoidarchway height
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The guide traverse is reoriented from a vertical hollow cylinder configuration to a horizontal beam-like structure positioned above the arch brake. This dimensional change allows the positioning mechanism to function in the horizontal plane while minimizing vertical space requirements, thereby reducing archway height.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The guide traverse is segmented into multiple sections with individual threaded spindles for each brake station. This segmentation allows for distributed positioning control along the length of the arch brake without requiring a tall centralized structure, reducing the overall archway height requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If more installation space is allocated to brake stations, then adjustment functionality is improved, but space for control elements and air supply is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment functionalityVSAvoidspace for control elements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The positioning drive mechanism is extracted from the brake station area and consolidated in a central location. This extraction frees up installation space at the brake stations for control elements, air supply components, and other essential systems while maintaining full adjustment functionality through the centralized positioning system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Manufacturing precision

If archway height is reduced, then stacking quality is improved, but brake station design becomes more constrained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestacking qualityVSAvoidbrake station design
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The positioning mechanism is relocated to operate in the horizontal dimension above the arch brake, allowing for reduced vertical clearance and lower archway height. This spatial reconfiguration enables improved stacking quality while the modular brake station design maintains functional complexity without increasing vertical space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP3704047B1Sheet processing machine having a delivery and method for adjusting a sheet brake in a delivery
Publication Date: 2022.10.12 KOENIG & BAUER AG
  • EP3704047B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3704047B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a sheet processing machine having a delivery, having a sheet conveying system and having a sheet brake having at least one axially displaceable brake station. The invention further relates to a method for adjusting a brake station of a sheet brake in a delivery of a sheet processing machine having a sheet conveying system. The problem addressed by the invention is that of creating an alternative sheet processing machine having a delivery, having a sheet conveying system and having a sheet brake having at least one axially displaceable brake station and creating an alternative method for adjusting a brake station of a sheet brake in a delivery of a sheet processing machine having a sheet conveying system. According to the invention, the problem is solved in that a positioning element (13) connected to the brake station (6) is provided which is guided by means of at least one flat surface (14) on a guide traverse (10) and carries the brake station (6) in doing so.