Metal Sheet Component Layout to Cut Waste and Weld Seams

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing production plans for three-dimensional components from metal sheets often result in inefficient and costly manufacturing due to variations in cutting, bending, and welding processes, lacking an optimized approach to minimize material consumption and production time.

Innovation Solution

A method that divides and rearranges the original two-dimensional construction plan along bending edges and weld seams to create a second plan, assessing and modifying connections to reduce costs and production time, utilizing graphs to represent and modify connections between surfaces, and ensuring stability through designated paths.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If the original two-dimensional construction plan is used for cutting and bending, then the component can be produced, but material waste increases and production cost rises

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial wasteVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the original two-dimensional construction plan into multiple surfaces along bending edges and weld seams. This segmentation allows each surface to be independently optimized and rearranged to minimize material waste while maintaining the structural integrity of the final component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the two-dimensional construction plan into a three-dimensional arrangement by considering the spatial relationships between surfaces. By optimizing the arrangement in three-dimensional space and then projecting it back to two dimensions for cutting, the method achieves better material utilization without compromising production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of time

If the original construction plan with extensive weld seams is used, then the component structure is complete, but production time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction timeVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and identifies all weld seams from the original construction plan. By separating the welding operations from the overall construction plan, the method can selectively optimize which weld seams are necessary and which can be eliminated or reduced, thereby decreasing production time while maintaining essential structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the construction plan by assessing and modifying the length of weld seams and number of bends. Through systematic parameter optimization, the method reduces unnecessary welding operations while preserving the structural requirements of the component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If more bending edges are introduced to create surfaces, then material utilization improves, but the complexity of the construction plan increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing easeVSAvoidconstruction plan complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism by assessing the construction plan based on multiple criteria including outer contour length, weld seam length, and number of bends. This assessment provides feedback that guides the optimization process, allowing the system to automatically adjust the construction plan to balance manufacturing ease with plan complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a dynamic optimization process where the construction plan can be iteratively improved. By using assessment criteria to evaluate different arrangements and automatically generating improved plans, the method adapts the construction plan to achieve optimal manufacturing ease without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240272620A1Method and computer program product for improving a production plan for producing a three-dimensional component from a metal sheet
Publication Date: 2024.08.15 OPTIMATE GMBH
  • US20240272620A1 patent drawing
  • US20240272620A1 patent drawing
  • US20240272620A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An improved production plan is created for producing a three-dimensional component from a metal sheet by cutting, bending, and/or welding. A method creates the improved production plan by: dividing a first two-dimensional construction plan of the original production plan along bending edges, or the bending edges and weld seams, into surfaces; rearranging the surfaces to form a second two-dimensional construction plan, assessing the construction plans according to a length of an outer contour for cutting the component out of the metal sheet, a length of the weld seams, or a number of bends; and producing the improved production plan from the second construction plan based upon the assessment of the second construction plan being better than the assessment of the first construction plan.