Sheet Dispenser Cutting Mechanism for Low-Pull Clean Tearing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sheet material dispensers require a high pull force to initiate a dispense cycle, leading to issues like 'tabbing' and excessive material usage, and lack the ability to adjust the tail length for user convenience and conservation.

Innovation Solution

The dispenser features a cutting mechanism with a serrated blade and blade carrier, which reduces the required pull force and includes a tail length adjustment mechanism, allowing for customizable tail length and encouraging single-sheet usage through a controlled dispense cycle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a high spring force is used to power the drive roller and cutting mechanism, then the sheet material can be fully or partially severed to provide a single sheet, but the pull force required to initiate a dispense cycle increases to about two pounds or more

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring forceVSAvoidpull force required
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the blade carrier movable rather than fixed. The blade carrier is positioned to engage the sheet material web and is movable between a cutting position and a retracted position. This dynamic positioning allows the cutting mechanism to be activated only when needed, reducing the continuous force requirement and enabling easier initiation of the dispense cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-positioning the blade carrier in a ready state within the drive roller, where it can quickly engage the sheet material web when pulled. The blade is pre-aligned and the carrier is positioned to immediately contact and cut the web upon activation, eliminating the need for complex force buildup mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Force

If a high pull force is required to initiate a dispense cycle, then the sheet material can be severed, but tabbing occurs where a small portion of the tail tears off in the user's hand

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepull forceVSAvoidtabbing prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating the cutting action at a specific location with the blade carrier and serrated blade. Instead of requiring high force across the entire sheet material, the cutting mechanism applies localized force precisely where needed to sever the web. This localized action reduces the overall pull force requirement and prevents tabbing by ensuring a clean, controlled cut.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies the intermediary principle by introducing the blade carrier as a mediating element between the user's pull and the sheet material web. The blade carrier translates the pulling motion into a precise cutting action, ensuring that the force is applied efficiently and cleanly to sever the web without causing tabbing or tearing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If the dispenser allows repeated and immediate cycling to dispense multiple sheets, then user convenience is improved, but sheet material conservation is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedispense cycle rateVSAvoidsheet material usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by incorporating a tail length adjustment mechanism that allows the user to control the length of the sheet material tail extending from the dispenser. By adjusting the tail length, the user receives feedback about the amount of material being dispensed, enabling them to optimize between convenience (longer tail for easier grasping) and conservation (shorter tail to reduce waste).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Device complexity

If the tail length is fixed, then the dispenser structure is simpler, but the tail may be inadequate for users to grip or may be too long causing excessive material use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetail length adjustment mechanismVSAvoidtail accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the tail length adjustable rather than fixed. The tail length adjustment mechanism allows the tail to be dynamically repositioned to different lengths based on user needs. This dynamic adjustment improves ease of operation by ensuring the tail is always at an optimal length for gripping, while the mechanism remains relatively simple in design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8578826B2Sheet material dispenser
Publication Date: 2013.11.12 ALWIN MFG CO INC
  • US8578826B2 patent drawing
  • US8578826B2 patent drawing
  • US8578826B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus for dispensing sheet material from a sheet material dispenser are described. Dispenser embodiments include drive and tension rollers supported within a housing forming a nip therebetween. Pulling of sheet material through the nip and against the drive roller rotates the drive roller. Dispenser embodiments may include a cutting mechanism powered by drive roller rotation with an improved carrier-supported blade permitting highly-efficient dispenser operation. Dispenser embodiments may include a sheet material tail length adjuster which permits the attendant to shorten or lengthen the tail length extending away from the dispenser. Dispenser embodiments may further include a sheet material conservation feature which imposes a delay between dispense cycles encouraging use of a single sheet of material and discouraging sheet material waste.