dispenser

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sheet dispensers often allow incorrect or inappropriate rolls of material to be loaded, compromising quality and usability due to reliance on gravity for locking mechanisms, which can be unreliable and prone to improper engagement.

Innovation Solution

A sheet dispenser system with a lock arrangement that includes a rotatable element and a locking element, where the roll's key engages to disengage the locking element, allowing rotation only when properly aligned, and a tilting member mechanism that ensures correct alignment and blocking of incorrect rolls, utilizing a biasing mechanism for tactile feedback and secure engagement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a gravity-based locking mechanism is used, then the device structure is simple, but the reliability of locking is poor and prone to improper engagement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking mechanism structureVSAvoidlocking engagement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional gravity-based locking approach by using a spring-based mechanism that actively engages the locking element with the rotatable element. The spring provides active force to ensure positive engagement, reversing the passive gravity-dependent approach and significantly improving locking reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring-based locking mechanism is designed to automatically engage and disengage based on the insertion and removal of the roll, without requiring manual intervention. The spring self-adjusts to maintain proper engagement, providing self-service functionality that improves reliability while keeping the overall structure simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If a simple mounting structure is used, then ease of operation is improved, but the ability to prevent incorrect rolls from being loaded is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroll insertion easeVSAvoidcorrect roll identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric key features on the roll and corresponding asymmetric keyways in the mounting structure. This asymmetric design ensures that only rolls with the correct key geometry can be properly inserted and engaged, preventing incorrect rolls from being loaded while maintaining simple operation for correct rolls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The key and keyway act as intermediary elements between the roll and the mounting structure. These intermediaries mediate the engagement process, ensuring that only compatible pairs (correct rolls) can achieve proper engagement, thus preventing incorrect rolls from being loaded while keeping the overall system simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a spring-based locking mechanism is used, then locking reliability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking engagement reliabilityVSAvoidlocking mechanism structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spring-based locking mechanism is designed to automatically engage and disengage based on the insertion and removal of the roll, without requiring manual intervention. The spring self-adjusts to maintain proper engagement, providing self-service functionality that improves reliability while keeping the overall structure simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism is extracted as a separate, modular component within the mounting structure. This allows the spring-based reliability improvement to be implemented as a discrete element rather than complicating the entire mounting structure, thereby improving reliability with minimal increase in overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If a key-based selection system is used, then the ability to ensure correct material is improved, but the ease of operation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial compatibility assuranceVSAvoidroll loading simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric key features on the roll and corresponding asymmetric keyways in the mounting structure. This asymmetric design ensures that only rolls with the correct key geometry can be properly inserted and engaged, preventing incorrect rolls from being loaded while maintaining simple operation for correct rolls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The key-based selection system operates automatically during the roll insertion process. The key and keyway self-align and self-verify compatibility, eliminating the need for manual verification steps and maintaining ease of operation while ensuring correct material selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3395738B1dispenser
Publication Date: 2020.07.08 MELITTA UK LTD
  • EP3395738B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3395738B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3395738B1 patent drawingFigure 3a

AI summary

A sheet dispenser system (2) having a roll of sheet material (4) and a housing (6) to receive the roll (4). The roll of sheet material (4) comprises a first end portion (16) incorporating a key (16a), and the housing (6) comprises a mounting portion (10) arranged to support the first end portion (16) of the roll (4). The mounting portion (10) comprises a lock arrangement (102) which is movable between a locked condition and a free condition. The lock arrangement (102) comprises a rotatable element (104) configured for rotation about an axis (A), and a locking element (30) configured for engagement with the rotatable element (104) to inhibit rotation of the rotatable element (104), such that, when the locking element (30) and the rotatable element (104) are engaged, the lock arrangement (102) occupies the locked condition, and when the locking element (30) and the rotatable element (104) are disengaged, the lock arrangement (102) occupies the free condition. The mounting portion (10) is arranged such that the roll (4) is movable between an engaged condition, in which the key (16a) engages the mounting portion (10), and a disengaged condition, in which the key (16a) is disengaged from the mounting portion (10), such that, when the roll (4) is moved from the disengaged to the engaged condition, the first end portion (16) of the roll moves the lock arrangement (102) into the free condition, thereby permitting rotation of the rotatable element (104). The locking element (30) and the rotatable element (104) are configured for engagement by relative movement of the locking element (30) and the rotatable element (104) towards each other in a direction along the axis of rotation (A) of the rotatable element (104).