Sheet Material Dispenser Cutting Mechanism to Prevent Tabbing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sheet material dispensers require a high pull force to initiate a dispense cycle, leading to issues like 'tabbing' and excessive material usage, and lack the ability to adjust the tail length for user convenience and conservation.

Innovation Solution

The dispenser features a cutting mechanism with a serrated blade and blade carrier that reduces the required pull force and includes a tail length adjustment mechanism, allowing for customizable tail length and encouraging single-sheet usage through a controlled dispense cycle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a high spring force is used to power the drive roller and cutting mechanism, then the sheet material can be fully or partially severed to provide a single sheet, but the pull force required to initiate a dispense cycle increases to two pounds or more

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring forceVSAvoidpull force required
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting mechanism is segmented into a cutting blade and a stationary tear bar. The cutting blade partially severs the sheet material web, and the stationary tear bar completes the severing action. This segmentation allows the spring force to be reduced while still achieving complete sheet separation, thereby reducing the pull force required to initiate a dispense cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A stationary tear bar is introduced as an intermediary element. The drive roller carries a cutting blade that partially cuts the web, and the stationary tear bar positioned adjacent to the drive roller completes the cut. This intermediary structure distributes the cutting action, reducing the force requirement on the spring mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Force

If a high pull force is required to initiate a dispense cycle, then the drive roller can be rotated to power the cutting mechanism, but tabbing occurs where a small portion of the sheet material tail tears off in the user's hand

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepull forceVSAvoidtabbing prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting action is segmented between a movable cutting blade on the drive roller and a stationary tear bar. This segmentation allows for a more controlled cutting process that reduces the risk of tabbing by ensuring the web is cleanly separated at the intended location rather than tearing unpredictably in the user's hand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting mechanism is designed to automatically complete the cutting action as the drive roller rotates. The stationary tear bar works in conjunction with the cutting blade to automatically finish the severing process without requiring additional user force or manipulation, thereby preventing tabbing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If the dispenser allows repeated and immediate cycling to dispense multiple sheets, then user needs are met, but sheet material conservation is compromised leading to excessive use and waste

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedispense cycle frequencyVSAvoidsheet material waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The dispenser incorporates a control system that provides feedback to limit the frequency of dispense cycles. The microprocessor monitors and controls the operation of the drive roller and cutting mechanism, preventing repeated immediate cycling and encouraging single-sheet usage to promote material conservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The dispenser is designed to enforce periodic action by limiting the frequency of dispense cycles. The control system introduces time intervals between cycles, preventing continuous rapid dispensing and promoting more deliberate, conservation-oriented usage patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Device complexity

If the tail length is fixed, then the dispenser structure is simple, but the tail may be inadequate for users to grip or too long causing excessive material use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetail length adjustment mechanismVSAvoidtail accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The tail length is made dynamic and adjustable rather than fixed. The dispenser incorporates a tail length adjustment mechanism that allows the attendant to set the length of the tail extending from the dispenser housing. This dynamic adjustment capability enables optimization of tail length for different user needs and dispenser locations while maintaining reasonable structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8146471B2Sheet material dispenser
Publication Date: 2012.04.03 ALWIN MFG CO INC
  • US8146471B2 patent drawing
  • US8146471B2 patent drawing
  • US8146471B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus for dispensing sheet material from a sheet material dispenser are described. Dispenser embodiments include drive and tension rollers supported within a housing forming a nip therebetween. Pulling of sheet material through the nip and against the drive roller rotates the drive roller. Dispenser embodiments may include a cutting mechanism powered by drive roller rotation with an improved carrier-supported blade permitting highly-efficient dispenser operation. Dispenser embodiments may include a sheet material tail length adjuster which permits the attendant to shorten or lengthen the tail length extending away from the dispenser. Dispenser embodiments may further include a sheet material conservation feature which imposes a delay between dispense cycles encouraging use of a single sheet of material and discouraging sheet material waste.