Sheet Finisher Tray Dynamics for Jam-Free Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sheet finishers face difficulties in removing sheets from the erect tray, especially when jammed, due to narrow openings and small sheet sizes, leading to mechanical discharge jams and incorrect fullness detection of the saddle tray.

Innovation Solution

A sheet finisher with a folding mechanism, discharging mechanism, and slip amount calculator that forms a folding line, discharges sheets, stacks them, and outputs the fullness state if the slip amount exceeds a threshold, allowing for easier removal and accurate detection of the saddle tray's fullness without mechanical discharge jams.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the sheet finisher stacks sheets on the erect tray at a location away from the opening to accommodate small sheet sizes, then the stacking capacity is improved, but the ease of sheet removal deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestacking capacityVSAvoidsheet removal ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by making the erect tray movable relative to the opening. The tray can be moved to a first position for normal stacking operations and to a second position for sheet removal, allowing the tray to dynamically change its position based on the operational requirement. This resolves the contradiction by enabling the tray to be away from the opening during stacking (improving capacity) but movable close to the opening during removal (improving ease of operation).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the saddle tray stacking limit is increased to maximize book production, then the productivity is improved, but the reliability deteriorates due to mechanical discharge jams

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebook production capacityVSAvoiddischarge reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the feedback principle by introducing a detection mechanism that monitors the stacking state of the saddle tray and provides feedback to the control unit. When the tray approaches its stacking limit, the system detects this state and automatically adjusts or stops the discharge operation, preventing mechanical jams. This allows the system to operate near the maximum stacking limit (improving productivity) while maintaining reliability through real-time monitoring and adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If a sensor is used to detect the fullness state of the saddle tray, then the measurement precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefullness detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the self-service principle by using the existing discharge mechanism's own operational parameters (such as motor current, rotation angle, or position sensors already present in the discharge system) to infer the stacking state of the saddle tray. Instead of adding a separate dedicated sensor system, the system utilizes self-diagnostic capabilities of the discharge mechanism to detect fullness conditions, thereby achieving measurement precision without significant increases in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8109496B2Sheet processing apparatus and methods for allowing sheet removal after process cancellation
Publication Date: 2012.02.07 KK TOSHIBA
  • US8109496B2 patent drawing
  • US8109496B2 patent drawing
  • US8109496B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sheet processing apparatus is disclosed. The sheet processing apparatus has a stacking unit configured to stack a sheet discharged from an image forming unit, the stacking unit including a stacker being configured to support a lower end of the sheet and a supporter being configured to support an under side of the sheet; a driver configured to drive the stacker along the supporter; and an opening configured for allowing removal of the sheet on the stacker to an outside; and a controller configured to control the stacker so that the stacker is driven to the opening along the supporter if a process is cancelled and if the sheet on the stacker needs to be removed.