Incremental Sheet Forming Toolpath Compensation for Spring Back

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Incremental sheet forming processes face challenges in compensating for spring back, as small changes in geometry can lead to significant changes in toolpath topology, resulting in undesirable outcomes such as tool marks, material islands, and disruptions in workflow.

Innovation Solution

A forming control unit is implemented to compensate for spring back by modifying the toolpath of the forming tool based on simulated incremental sheet forming operations. This unit determines target shapes, simulates forming processes, calculates geometric errors, and inserts compensating contours to maintain desired structural shapes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the toolpath is modified to compensate for spring back, then the geometric accuracy of the formed structure is improved, but the topology of the toolpath changes significantly leading to unexpected effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric accuracyVSAvoidtoolpath topology
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing a virtual simulation of the incremental sheet forming process before actual manufacturing. The simulation predicts spring back effects and pre-calculates compensatory toolpath adjustments, allowing the system to anticipate and correct geometric deviations before they occur in physical production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating a virtual model of the forming process and structure. A digital twin or simulation copy of the incremental sheet forming process is executed first to predict outcomes and determine compensation strategies, which are then applied to the actual physical forming operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If small changes are made in geometry to compensate for spring back, then the target shape accuracy is improved, but the toolpath topology changes completely causing tool marks and material islands

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget shape accuracyVSAvoidtool marks and material islands
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using simulation results to inform and adjust the toolpath compensation strategy. The virtual simulation provides feedback on how geometric modifications affect both accuracy and toolpath topology, allowing iterative optimization of compensation parameters to achieve desired accuracy without generating defects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically adjusting toolpath parameters such as step size, contour spacing, and tool engagement depth based on simulation predictions. These controlled parameter modifications enable compensation for spring back while maintaining stable toolpath topology and avoiding the formation of tool marks or material islands

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If the toolpath topology changes due to geometric modifications, then spring back compensation is achieved, but workflow efficiency decreases due to re-ordering of sheet forming operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring back compensationVSAvoidworkflow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses preliminary action by determining the complete compensated toolpath through virtual simulation before actual manufacturing begins. This upfront planning allows all necessary compensation adjustments to be incorporated in advance, eliminating the need for mid-process modifications that would disrupt workflow efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively compensates for spring back in incremental sheet forming, ensuring accurate geometric formation, reducing tool marks and material islands, and maintaining workflow efficiency by maintaining a stable toolpath.

Implementation Method 1

When a piece of sheet metal is formed, an amount of strain in the sheet metal is elastically recovered, which is known as spring back

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring back: Elastic Recovery

Data Source

PatentUS12220738B2Systems and methods for compensating for spring back of structures formed through incremental sheet forming
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 THE BOEING CO
  • US12220738B2 patent drawing
  • US12220738B2 patent drawing
  • US12220738B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An incremental sheet forming system and method are configured to form a structure through an incremental sheet forming process. The incremental sheet forming system and method include a forming control unit that compensates for spring back of a structure to be formed through the incremental sheet forming process.