Sheet material and method for producing same

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sheet materials produced using water-dispersed polyurethane tend to have a hard texture due to dense adhesion between the fibrous base material and the polyurethane, lacking flexibility, chemical resistance, and dyeing resistance compared to organic solvent-based polyurethane systems.

Innovation Solution

A sheet material is developed with an elastomer and a fibrous base material comprising ultrafine fibers, where the elastomer has a hydrophilic group and N-acylurea or isourea bonds. The production method involves a first elastomer precursor impregnation step, an ultrafine fiber generating step, and a second elastomer impregnation step, with specific conditions to achieve improved flexibility, chemical resistance, and dyeing resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If water-dispersed polyurethane is used to impregnate fibrous base material, then environmental harm is reduced, but the sheet material becomes hard and loses flexibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental harm from organic solventsVSAvoidflexibility of sheet material
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the molecular structure parameters of the polyurethane elastomer by introducing hydrophilic groups and specific chemical bonds (N-acylurea and isourea bonds). This structural modification allows the polyurethane to form a less dense, more flexible coating that maintains softness while using water as a dispersant instead of organic solvents, thus resolving the contradiction between environmental friendliness and flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite structure by combining polyurethane elastomer with hydrophilic groups and specific chemical bonds within the molecular chain. This composite molecular structure enables the material to simultaneously achieve environmental compatibility (water dispersibility) and mechanical flexibility, overcoming the hardness problem associated with conventional water-dispersed polyurethane

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If water-dispersed polyurethane is used for impregnation, then organic solvent usage is eliminated, but chemical resistance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorganic solvent usageVSAvoidchemical resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention modifies the chemical structure parameters of polyurethane by incorporating N-acylurea bonds and isourea bonds, which enhance chemical resistance. These structural changes allow the water-dispersed polyurethane to withstand chemical environments better, thus improving reliability while maintaining the environmental benefit of eliminating organic solvents

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If water-dispersed polyurethane is used for impregnation, then organic solvent usage is eliminated, but dyeing resistance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorganic solvent usageVSAvoiddyeing resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the molecular parameters of polyurethane by introducing hydrophilic groups and specific chemical bonds that affect dye interaction. These structural modifications enable the water-dispersed polyurethane to provide better dyeing resistance while maintaining environmental friendliness and eliminating organic solvent usage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Strength

If dense adhesion between fibrous base material and polyurethane is achieved, then bonding strength is improved, but flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding strengthVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the adhesion mechanism parameters by modifying the polyurethane molecular structure with hydrophilic groups and specific bonds. This creates a bonding interface that provides sufficient strength while maintaining flexibility, resolving the contradiction between bonding strength and flexibility in water-dispersed polyurethane systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The resulting sheet material exhibits enhanced flexibility, chemical resistance, and dyeing resistance, with reduced fiber fragments during washing, maintaining its appearance and properties even after exposure to solvents or harsh environments.

Implementation Method 1

the elastomer has a hydrophilic group and N-acylurea bonds and/or isourea bonds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical Bonding: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

a so-called wet heat solidification method in which a hydrated state of a water-dispersed polyurethane dispersion is collapsed by heating and polyurethane emulsions are aggregated to be solidified

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCoagulation: Coagulation

Data Source

PatentUS12338575B2Sheet material and method for producing same
Publication Date: 2025.06.24 TORAY INDUSTRIES INC
  • US12338575B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The sheet material according to the present invention has a polymer elastic body and a fibrous base material comprising ultrafine fibers, wherein the average single fiber diameter of the ultrafine fibers is 0.1 μm to 10.0 μm, the polymer elastic body has a hydrophilic group and an N-acylurea bond and/or an isourea bond, and the following conditions are satisfied: the longitudinal stiffness, in accordance with method A (45° cantilever method) in the text of “8.21 Stiffness” of JIS L 1096:2010 “Testing Methods for Woven and Knitted Fabrics”, is 40 mm to 140 mm; and after immersion for 24 hours in N,N-dimethylformamide, the following are obtained in wear testing using a pressing load of 12.0 kPa and 20,000 friction cycles in accordance with method E (Martindale method) in the text of “8.19 Wear Strength and Friction Discoloration” of JIS L 1096:2010 “Testing Methods for Woven and Knitted Fabrics”: a grade of at least 4 and a wear loss of not more than 25 mg.