Metal Sheet Necking Limit Identification for Stretch Flanging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional press forming methods fail to accurately predict necking limit strain in metal sheets during stretch flanging, leading to potential fractures in mass-produced products, as they rely on fracture-related indices rather than specific necking criteria.

Innovation Solution

A method that measures strain distribution and increment ratios in notched metal sheet specimens with varying strain gradients to identify the necking limit strain, allowing for the prediction of necking occurrence before fracture through a relation between strain gradient and necking limit strain.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional fracture-based indices are used to predict press forming feasibility, then the method is simple to implement, but it cannot accurately predict necking occurrence before fracture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenecking prediction accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the measurement parameter from fracture strain to necking limit strain, and introduces strain gradient as a new parameter to characterize the deformation state. By measuring strain distribution and calculating strain gradient (dε/dx), the method achieves accurate necking prediction before fracture occurs, resolving the contradiction between prediction accuracy and measurement simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If fracture limit is used as the judgement criterion, then mass production variations are not accounted for, but implementing necking prediction requires additional measurement capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepress forming feasibility prediction reliabilityVSAvoidstrain distribution measurement difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary measurement of strain distribution across the sheet thickness direction before fracture occurs. By measuring strain at multiple positions (including the sheet edge) and calculating strain gradient in advance, the method predicts necking risk before it materializes, improving reliability while the measurement complexity is managed through systematic approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces direct mechanical fracture observation with a predictive mechanical field analysis. Instead of waiting for physical fracture to occur, the method uses strain distribution measurement and gradient calculation to substitute for direct fracture detection, enabling earlier and more reliable prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a unified fracture index is applied to all deformation behaviors, then the judgement method is simplified, but it cannot account for variations in deformation behavior across different parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability to various deformation behaviorsVSAvoidnecking limit identification precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates a universal necking prediction method based on strain gradient that can be applied to various deformation behaviors (stretch flanging, bending, drawing, etc.). The strain gradient parameter serves as a multi-functional indicator that adapts to different deformation modes while maintaining consistent prediction accuracy, resolving the contradiction between universality and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate identification of necking limit strain and prediction of fracture occurrence in press forming, preventing defects in mass-produced products by simulating press forming processes and determining feasibility without dedicated tools.

Implementation Method 1

When a metal sheet is deformed in press forming, plastic deformation progresses, and if the deformation concentrates at a specific sheet edge of the metal sheet, necking occurs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12117422B2Method for identifying necking limit strain of metal sheet
Publication Date: 2024.10.15 JFE STEEL CORP
  • US12117422B2 patent drawing
  • US12117422B2 patent drawing
  • US12117422B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for identifying a necking limit strain of a metal sheet includes a step of measuring the distribution of strain in a tensile orthogonal direction in a tensile deformation process of a notch root for two or more types of sheet specimens having a notch geometry in a portion of a sheet edge; a step of obtaining a strain increment ratio of the notch root in the tensile deformation process and a strain gradient in the tensile orthogonal direction; a step of obtaining necking limit strain at which necking occurs in the notch root based on the strain increment ratio in the tensile deformation process; and a step of identifying the necking limit strain as a function of the strain gradient from the relation between the necking limit strain obtained for the two or more types of sheet specimens and the strain gradient at that time.